McLaren vs Lewis

[andrew]

Or a one word answer.

We need Raikkonen back in F1. He's doing nothing at the momment.

[HampusA]

Actually he´s doing Oval. Did a race a couple of days ago.
He needs to get back though.

[HampusA]

If you are Finnish the answer is "having a ---"

Brilliant His episode with top gear is also very nice.
I´m half finnish but unfortunately i don´t have all of the super fast DNA full blooded finns have

Another classic right here

[Mandrake]

Schumacher breaks of Lewis' diffuser endplate at St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa hits Rosberg in back on climb up the hill from St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa on turn-in sharply at Loews to cut-off Hamilton and hits Webber at the rear - avoidable? penalty?
Di Resta hits D'Ambrosio at Loews (after the Alguersuari coming together)and damages his wing - avoidable? penalty?
Kobayashi hits Sutil at Mirabeau - avoidable? penalty?

These are the...'is it co's i iz....' that I believe Lewis hints at.

sAx

Incident in traffic right after the start, no agression or passing attempt.

Massa damaged only his car. Had the tyre gotten a flatspot caused by this, it wouldn't be bulletproof evidence it was caused by the wing.

etc. etc.

Thos are minor incidents....remember the parts flying around in the HAM situations, those were much harder impacts, leading to the ultimate crash of at least one of them.

[sAx]

Schumacher breaks of Lewis' diffuser endplate at St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa hits Rosberg in back on climb up the hill from St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa on turn-in sharply at Loews to cut-off Hamilton and hits Webber at the rear - avoidable? penalty?
Di Resta hits D'Ambrosio at Loews (after the Alguersuari coming together)and damages his wing - avoidable? penalty?
Kobayashi hits Sutil at Mirabeau - avoidable? penalty?

These are the...'is it co's i iz....' that I believe Lewis hints at.

sAx

Incident in traffic right after the start, no agression or passing attempt.

Massa damaged only his car. Had the tyre gotten a flatspot caused by this, it wouldn't be bulletproof evidence it was caused by the wing.

etc. etc.

Thos are minor incidents....remember the parts flying around in the HAM situations, those were much harder impacts, leading to the ultimate crash of at least one of them.

[...] I guess that means hitting another car does not count as an avoidable accident!


sAx

[Diesel]

It's quite amusing really, because you guys are all exactly like Hamilton. You think everyone else is in the wrong!

[beelsebob]

It's quite amusing really, because you guys are all exactly like Hamilton. You think everyone else is in the wrong!

It's quite amusing really, because you're exactly like Hamilton. You think all of us are wrong!

[HampusA]

Wait a minute.. i thought you two were on the same bandwagon?

[andrew]

Some Hamilton fans are as fickle as their hero!

I refer you to Ciro Pabon's comments on this matter.

[beelsebob]

Wait a minute.. i thought you two were on the same bandwagon?

I'm always on the faulty logic bandwagon, whether their faulty logic supports my point of view or not.

[HampusA]

Doesn´t make any sense at all even from a logic point of view but whatever i guess

[Paul]

How could you forget the Gronholm classic?

[HampusA]

Love the explanation with the fist in the end

[Diesel]

I'm not clouded by fan-boyism as many on this forum are. Hamilton was hot-headed in Monaco, it didn't just cost him, it effectively cost McLaren the race. It was quite clear for me however, that in the two incidents where Hamilton was involved in contact with another car, he wasn't soley to blame.

[doink]

How could you forget the Gronholm classic?

genius! The hand gesture is priceless!