andrew
you are right,in fact ,I repeat, mine comment was only a provocation
thanks for your opinion
The bigger issue is a broken back. If a bone there gets broken, then the driver can be fine initially, but if moved, the spinal cord severed and the driver paralysed/killed.Callum wrote:What a stupid thing to say. Unless you can see through people's skulls and see that they do not have internal bleeding then going on the side of caution is fine!
quite the provocation it seems. It is kinda trollish slagging a driver for not leaving the vehicle, when he couldn't feel his legs.Italy88 wrote:andrew
you are right,in fact ,I repeat, mine comment was only a provocation
thanks for your opinion
I don't know if you are joking, but if this is serious your post is simply nonsense. After all deaths in motorsport not only in F1, the first thing always should be SAFETY.Italy88 wrote:Hi, it may seem provocative but I think that nowadays after a (little) crash,drivers use to stay in the cockpit not for injuries but for ''their care''.
For example, doing the calculations,Perez's deceleration was not so high (the same of a 50km/h crash with a normal car, but with hans, helmet,and 5 point belt,and an 'athlet's body) and Petrov says that he stayed in the car because hi ''he could not feel his legs'' that is due to the fear, not to and injury!
Remenber the big crash of the past, driver, if not injured, used to jump out the car. Driver are now too''pampered'', so they can stop a qualify or a race olny because they have experience with the Ps3 or Xbox, not with the actual race's situations.
This situation is showed also by the fia penalty to race accidents like the hamilton-massa one. If there are not ''drivers of the past'' like alonso, hamilton exc. we will look at races without overtakes!
What is your opinion?
You must be playing too much virtual reality computer games. Sorry, but this is a very bad opinion of yours.Italy88 wrote:Hi, it may seem provocative but I think that nowadays after a (little) crash,drivers use to stay in the cockpit not for injuries but for ''their care''.
For example, doing the calculations,Perez's deceleration was not so high (the same of a 50km/h crash with a normal car, but with hans, helmet,and 5 point belt,and an 'athlet's body) and Petrov says that he stayed in the car because hi ''he could not feel his legs'' that is due to the fear, not to and injury!
Remenber the big crash of the past, driver, if not injured, used to jump out the car. Driver are now too''pampered'', so they can stop a qualify or a race olny because they have experience with the Ps3 or Xbox, not with the actual race's situations.
This situation is showed also by the fia penalty to race accidents like the hamilton-massa one. If there are not ''drivers of the past'' like alonso, hamilton exc. we will look at races without overtakes!
What is your opinion?
That looks like someone's visor.Pandamasque wrote:Note, at 0:03 something falls into Petrov's cockpit
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX5Qxaix ... r_embedded[/youtube]