I find what happens between racers on the track very technical. If I have an arguement about it, I try to put it forward in a rational way, on a rational basis.
Aint it the truth.
That's where the meat of the discussions should be. Regardless of who is involved.
@JET you are over analyzing, which is also the worst problem.
I think for any "fan" of a driver, it comes as a bit of a shock that their chosen driver is indeed mortal after all.
Those posts are the irrational part of the arguments. This "chosen driver", yadda yadda stuff is very tiring, and it's a figment of the imagination. It's not even technical. And mods need to put more energy towards these things.
Criticism done correctly is actually constructive and offers a better perspective.
This is also a silly loop hole for bashing. As these constructive criticsms only go one way, to one driver. More like constructive grudges.
It's almost as some see their chosen driver as an extension of themselves. And criticism therefore becomes personal.
Hamilton has 80% of the BBC camera. No?
The camera chooses the driver. And you hate that.
I find what happens between racers on the track very technical.
The real hardcore f1 fans choose this ^.
There is no cult or conspiracy. Most "fans" on this forum have been watching F1 from the 90s long before Hamilton.
The best solution to this problem, is to ban the word fanboy, ban psychological analysis of forum members. And ban silly slights that really have no contribution to the forum.
As bad as Hamilton Cult followers are; they are at least discussing the race events, rightly or deludedly. This is within the rules of the forum.
the other silly stuff that comes as a reaction, like fanboy this, chosen one that, is really not needed.
Simply counter a point with your own point. No need for this:
some from labeling it "bs, nonesense, drivel, etc". I think that tends to happen when they can't create an 'against' arguement against the 'for' arguement; almost always ends up with childish vitriol and a locked thread.
So create an against argument instead of the whining and baiting.