ferrari veto

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

ferrari veto

Post

ther may have been a good reason in the past for allowing this to ferrari , but there certainly isn't today

so when this agreement expired in 2012 , why did Todt renew it ?
Last edited by lebesset on 04 Nov 2015, 14:52, edited 2 times in total.
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

User avatar
SiLo
130
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: ferrari veto

Post

Right now I would say Mercedes are doing more for F1 than Ferrari are. Maybe they should give the veto to the champions each year?
Felipe Baby!

giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: ferrari veto

Post

SiLo wrote:Right now I would say Mercedes are doing more for F1 than Ferrari are. Maybe they should give the veto to the champions each year?
Lol funny Mercedes has done way more damage to the F1 product on the track than Ferrari have over the last 2 years. You may want to thank ferrari for finding a loophole and allowing in season token usage...on the flip side which team has blocked(vetoed) every chance for in season development?? .mercedes... if you are a Mercedes fan then its all good for you because your team has an advantage and their vote was needed to allow other teams to catch up.Ferrari on the other hand Vetoed a ridiculous idea by the FIA to basically dictate what the engine manufacturers profit margin should be... that veto benefitted every single engine manufacturer not just Ferrari.. mercedes on the other hand vetoed every engine idea to preserve their advantage.
Every single team agreed that Ferrari should have a veto ....during negotiations for the las concorde agreement.....

User avatar
mertol
7
Joined: 19 Mar 2013, 10:02

Re: ferrari veto

Post

There is one big difference between Ferrari and the other teams. Ferrari are commited to the sport so its future is really important for them. All the other manufacturers are there just for the publicity and might quit at any time.

Shooty81
17
Joined: 25 Sep 2009, 14:13

Re: ferrari veto

Post

mertol wrote:There is one big difference between Ferrari and the other teams. Ferrari are commited to the sport so its future is really important for them. All the other manufacturers are there just for the publicity and might quit at any time.
Williams?

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: ferrari veto

Post

giantfan10 wrote: Lol funny Mercedes has done way more damage to the F1 product on the track than Ferrari have over the last 2 years. You may want to thank ferrari for finding a loophole and allowing in season token usage...on the flip side which team has blocked(vetoed) every chance for in season development?? .mercedes... if you are a Mercedes fan then its all good for you because your team has an advantage and their vote was needed to allow other teams to catch up.Ferrari on the other hand Vetoed a ridiculous idea by the FIA to basically dictate what the engine manufacturers profit margin should be... that veto benefitted every single engine manufacturer not just Ferrari.. mercedes on the other hand vetoed every engine idea to preserve their advantage.
Every single team agreed that Ferrari should have a veto ....during negotiations for the las concorde agreement.....
The amount of factually incorrect information here is gobsmacking. To correct you, I have provided information from a number of sources that should see to it that you become informed. I'm going out on a limb hoping for that...

Mercedes, Renault, Ferrari and Honda all agreed with the FIA to increase token usage for next from 25 to 32, 7 extra tokens.
Mercedes could easily have voted against this to preserve it's advantage. They did not.

http://www.f1hub.net/index.php/2015/10/ ... -for-2016/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/34548368

http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2015/10/m ... m-veto-it/

http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/138 ... pment-2016

http://www.grandprix247.com/2015/10/21/ ... lp-rivals/
Mercedes was willing to allow the changes because it realised having two manufacturers struggling so badly risked them pulling out, which would be bad for F1.
Wolff wrote:Honda and Renault want to be fighting with us at eye-level,So we cannot just take the hard line and always optimise the rules in our direction.
And in addition to the increase in tokens, all teams also agreed that the areas of development remain the same as before.
Which means the proposed freeze on the upper and lower crankcase, crankshaft, air-valve system and ancillaries drive remain unfrozen to development.
You've been taken to the water giantfan....up to you now.
JET set

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 11:34
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: ferrari veto

Post

giantfan10 wrote: Every single team agreed that Ferrari should have a veto ....during negotiations for the las concorde agreement.....
Every single team? Every single team? Do you have a source for this claim? Because I cannot see Mclaren agreeing to that in a million years.
Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! 🤦🏻‍♂️

santos
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2014, 16:48

Re: ferrari veto

Post

adrianjordan wrote:
giantfan10 wrote: Every single team agreed that Ferrari should have a veto ....during negotiations for the las concorde agreement.....
Every single team? Every single team? Do you have a source for this claim? Because I cannot see Mclaren agreeing to that in a million years.
Jean Todt said that: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/121597

Jonnycraig
6
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 20:48

Re: ferrari veto

Post

The simple answer is that, as unpalatable a fact as it may be, F1 needs Ferrari, now more than ever, and every other team knows it.

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: ferrari veto

Post

One wonders if views would be different if different drivers were driving for Ferrari... :roll:
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: ferrari veto

Post

FoxHound wrote:
giantfan10 wrote: Lol funny Mercedes has done way more damage to the F1 product on the track than Ferrari have over the last 2 years. You may want to thank ferrari for finding a loophole and allowing in season token usage...on the flip side which team has blocked(vetoed) every chance for in season development?? .mercedes... if you are a Mercedes fan then its all good for you because your team has an advantage and their vote was needed to allow other teams to catch up.Ferrari on the other hand Vetoed a ridiculous idea by the FIA to basically dictate what the engine manufacturers profit margin should be... that veto benefitted every single engine manufacturer not just Ferrari.. mercedes on the other hand vetoed every engine idea to preserve their advantage.
Every single team agreed that Ferrari should have a veto ....during negotiations for the las concorde agreement.....
The amount of factually incorrect information here is gobsmacking. To correct you, I have provided information from a number of sources that should see to it that you become informed. I'm going out on a limb hoping for that...

Mercedes, Renault, Ferrari and Honda all agreed with the FIA to increase token usage for next from 25 to 32, 7 extra tokens.
Mercedes could easily have voted against this to preserve it's advantage. They did not.

http://www.f1hub.net/index.php/2015/10/ ... -for-2016/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/34548368

http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2015/10/m ... m-veto-it/

http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/138 ... pment-2016

http://www.grandprix247.com/2015/10/21/ ... lp-rivals/
Mercedes was willing to allow the changes because it realised having two manufacturers struggling so badly risked them pulling out, which would be bad for F1.
Wolff wrote:Honda and Renault want to be fighting with us at eye-level,So we cannot just take the hard line and always optimise the rules in our direction.
And in addition to the increase in tokens, all teams also agreed that the areas of development remain the same as before.
Which means the proposed freeze on the upper and lower crankcase, crankshaft, air-valve system and ancillaries drive remain unfrozen to development.
You've been taken to the water giantfan....up to you now.
over the last 2 years they have obviously changed their tune after realising the damage their blocking of every effort by the other manufacturers to catch up does to their brand in the general public. Wolf admitted as much.... go research that : )

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: ferrari veto

Post

giantfan10 wrote: over the last 2 years they have obviously changed their tune after realising the damage their blocking of every effort by the other manufacturers to catch up does to their brand in the general public. Wolf admitted as much.... go research that : )
Why don't you post what Wolff said, and I'll walk you through it?
This here thread is about the Ferrari veto, the very real Ferrari veto.
Not the imaginary Mercedes veto, that doesn't exist, but still allows you to post absolute tripe.

If you have evidence to put forward suggesting that claptrap, post it. If not, pre-script every post with.... 'in my fantasy world'.
Last edited by FoxHound on 02 Nov 2015, 23:28, edited 1 time in total.
JET set

toraabe
12
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 10:42

Re: ferrari veto

Post

There is no difference between Ferrari, Williams or Mercedes.
Why should Ferrari win on behalf of the rest ?
If Ferrari were winning like Mercedes is doing today,
Is that your dream ?
.
Jonnycraig wrote:The simple answer is that, as unpalatable a fact as it may be, F1 needs Ferrari, now more than ever, and every other team knows it.

santos
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2014, 16:48

Re: ferrari veto

Post

toraabe wrote:There is no difference between Ferrari, Williams or Mercedes.
Why should Ferrari win on behalf of the rest ?
If Ferrari were winning like Mercedes is doing today,
Is that your dream ?
.
Jonnycraig wrote:The simple answer is that, as unpalatable a fact as it may be, F1 needs Ferrari, now more than ever, and every other team knows it.
Do you belive that there is no difference between Ferrari, Williams, Mclaren and Mercedes? From a commercial view, Ferrari is the most important brand for F1. Even when they don't win people talk about them. In the grandstands people wave flags from ferrari, they wear caps and t-shirts.
All the teams support the veto from Ferrari, i belive that Mercedes is grateful to them by using that power.

giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: ferrari veto

Post

FoxHound wrote:
giantfan10 wrote: over the last 2 years they have obviously changed their tune after realising the damage their blocking of every effort by the other manufacturers to catch up does to their brand in the general public. Wolf admitted as much.... go research that : )
Why don't you post what Wolff said, and I'll walk you through it?
This here thread is about the Ferrari veto, the very real Ferrari veto.
Not the imaginary Mercedes veto, that doesn't exist, but still allows you to post absolute tripe.

If you have evidence to put forward suggesting that claptrap, post it. If not, pre-script every post with.... 'in my fantasy world'.
as usual internet insults.... lol amusing as usual
Mercedes has blocked every single attempt to open up engine development untill now after they have won 2 championships.
secondly my response was to the previous poster who claimed that Mercedes has done more for the sport than Ferrari and they should in fact be the team that has the vetoe awarded to them... that should answer your idiotic rant about what this thread is about and why mercedes is included in it.
go look for Wolff"s quote yourself its out there

Post Reply