G-Rock wrote:
In what context should i take this comment? A womans hole or just a hole in general? I would think that some of the ladies on this website could/should be offended by such a comment. Please keep this site professional and decent.
These holes in question are for data collection, air temp, tire temp, air pressure etc. The skies the limit. When they are not in use, they plug them up so people like Reca can't get their fingers or peckers in there.
First, the original context of the phrase was completely unrelated with women but with an hole on an airplane fuselage. Since then the “it’s just an hole” became a code phrase between us to indicate that while trying to understand what something is for people often forget about the most simple possibilities, and I think the current situation fits.
Your interpretation (and the following “nice” comment) tells more about you than about my phrase.
Second, back on topic, on this page you can find the pics taken at the test in Barcelona 31/05-02/06 :
http://f1.racing-live.com/f1/en/photos/ ... 0_01.shtml
De La Rosa was there all the days while Paffett only the first one and JPM the following two.
It’s logical to expect that De La Rosa used the same car all three days while JPM took Paffett’s one.
This is Paffett with the camera, you can easily see 2 of the 4 holes on the bulge in correspondence with the holes on the chassis :
[IMG::]
http://f1.racing-live.com/f1/photos/200 ... po_123.jpg[/img]
[IMG:594:400]
http://f1.racing-live.com/f1/photos/200 ... po_127.jpg[/img]
This is JPM the following days :
[IMG:602:400]
http://f1.racing-live.com/f1/photos/200 ... po_149.jpg[/img]