Most beautiful F1 car contest

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:11 pm

Pure vulgarity!



Beats that clinical screamer noise on all accounts, imho.
"Bullshit!" - James Hunt
Sebp
 
Joined: 9 Mar 2010
Location: Surrounded

Post Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:17 pm

For V12´s i think Ferrari played in it´s own league to be honest.
The truth will come out...
HampusA
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2011

Post Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:26 pm

HampusA wrote:For V12´s i think Ferrari played in it´s own league to be honest.


Not bad indeed!
Sebp
 
Joined: 9 Mar 2010
Location: Surrounded

Post Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:53 am

The 1978 Ferrai 312 t3 was one of the most beautiful ever to my mind.

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/pic/162/ ... T3_13.html
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:16 pm

Oss El Boss
 
Joined: 4 Jun 2011

Post Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:17 pm

Image
Oss El Boss
 
Joined: 4 Jun 2011

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:09 am

If that car could dial it's aero appendages down from a 10 (the BMW f.108 being an 11) down to about 7.5 it would look perfect.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute
Giblet
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Location: Downtown Canada

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:05 pm

I have to say that, for me, those outboard mirrors are very aesthetically pleasing. They make the gar seem more.... chunky. If that makes sense!

I don't like that car's aero though. Yet I like the BMW's. I have strange and inconsistant taste! :lol:
Muulka
 
Joined: 12 Mar 2011

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:16 pm

I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.

The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.
andrew
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:56 pm

andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.

The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.

Heh, each to their own – I find the cluttered wings everywhere the ugliest cars they've ever made. In fact, in ~2000 or so (don't remember the exact year) the FIA banned wings on the side pods exactly because they were ugly as sin.

Personally I think current F1 cars are some of the most beautiful there's been – it's a close run thing with the cigar shaped ones though.
beelsebob
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Elgin, Scotland

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:57 pm

andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.

The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.


Have to agree with you there, I personally found the pre-2009 era cars with all the aero-sculpture stunning. I find the idea just as beautiful ( if an idea can be beautiful :?: ) that everything on those cars was purely function over form, and that it just happened to look amazing in the process. Obviously it's still the case with modern f1 cars, but I find there is less to appreciate than before these rules came into effect.
ajdavison2
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2010

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:12 pm

ajdavison2 wrote:
andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.

The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.


Have to agree with you there, I personally found the pre-2009 era cars with all the aero-sculpture stunning. I find the idea just as beautiful ( if an idea can be beautiful :?: ) that everything on those cars was purely function over form, and that it just happened to look amazing in the process. Obviously it's still the case with modern f1 cars, but I find there is less to appreciate than before these rules came into effect.

Odd, in my experience almost all engineers will go after what they call "elegance" – generally meaning finding simple solutions to complex problems. Newey's RB7 pretty much epitomises the idea, and to a certain extent the MP4-26. I tend to find the "oh, just stick more wings on it" approach a rather ugly solution both from the aesthetics point of view, and from the engineering point of view.
beelsebob
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Elgin, Scotland

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:13 pm

I personally do not really like them on their looks. It is safe as saying that you think this or that is the most good looking cranes ever. These card are built for one purpose, go fast, the best looking doesnt win prizes with it. Although I describe some as good looking and such I find them good looking by the way of engineering, and complexity for example. herefore I prefer 2008 cars way above the cars running now.
wesley123
 
Joined: 23 Feb 2008

Post Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:14 pm

Probably why I'm not an engineer then :wink: haha
ajdavison2
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:20 am

wesley123 wrote:I personally do not really like them on their looks. It is safe as saying that you think this or that is the most good looking cranes ever. These card are built for one purpose, go fast, the best looking doesnt win prizes with it. Although I describe some as good looking and such I find them good looking by the way of engineering, and complexity for example. herefore I prefer 2008 cars way above the cars running now.


What is your favourite crane aesthetically?

I jest, I jest...

Just because they're not made to be beautiful, doesn't mean they can't be. Many, many beautiful thingswere not designed with beauty in mind.
Muulka
 
Joined: 12 Mar 2011

PreviousNext

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], mantikos, McMrocks and 13 guests