Pure vulgarity!
Beats that clinical screamer noise on all accounts, imho.
andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.
The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.
andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.
The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.
ajdavison2 wrote:andrew wrote:I think this is when the cars were at their most aesthetically pleasing.
The current cars are far too sparse for my liking.
Have to agree with you there, I personally found the pre-2009 era cars with all the aero-sculpture stunning. I find the idea just as beautiful ( if an idea can be beautiful) that everything on those cars was purely function over form, and that it just happened to look amazing in the process. Obviously it's still the case with modern f1 cars, but I find there is less to appreciate than before these rules came into effect.
wesley123 wrote:I personally do not really like them on their looks. It is safe as saying that you think this or that is the most good looking cranes ever. These card are built for one purpose, go fast, the best looking doesnt win prizes with it. Although I describe some as good looking and such I find them good looking by the way of engineering, and complexity for example. herefore I prefer 2008 cars way above the cars running now.
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], mantikos, McMrocks and 13 guests