Belatti wrote:Performance wise it has to be aerodynamics.
No over way to expand g-g-V diagram other than aero.
xpensive wrote:Here's more of the same;
I used to be an advocate for a flat-bottom rule as long as there is a car to measure, but when I behold today's goulish front-wing contraptions and learn how important it is, while how detrimental the lack of it's downforce contribution is for overtaking, I say get rid of it once and for all?
If you ditch the thousands of Newtons of downforce at that end, there's little need to keep the same at the rear if you wish to make the car driveable. Studying the FIA technical-regulations as they are, outlawing all bodywork outside 250 mm from car's centerline, ahead of the front wheels, would be very easy indeed.
autogyro wrote:If F1 followers wait for every little aero idea and upgrade they are acting in a very naive way.
It means the square root of nothing in the real world.
At last more people are starting to see how irelevent it is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests