The photos in the "Most Beautiful" thread got me thinking. They were unassailable in their time, but now they have been relegated to also-rans.
Discuss.
zeph wrote:The photos in the "Most Beautiful" thread got me thinking. They were unassailable in their time, but now they have been relegated to also-rans.
Discuss.
gilgen wrote:What's with the heading? You have not explained. The only similarity is the fact that both teams are/were privateers, run by dedicated men. Other than that, there is no apparent connection.
gridwalker wrote:Given the fact that Williams were the most successful team of the 90s, I'd say that a comparison to Lotus would be more fair than comparing them with Tyrrel.
zeph wrote:It could be, but they have not won a title since 1997, and their last win was Brazil 2004. Isn't it fair to say that it has been downhill since (except for maybe 2003)?
gilgen wrote: But I still cannot see why you are likening Williams to Tyrell. Please explain.
zeph wrote:gilgen wrote:What's with the heading? You have not explained. The only similarity is the fact that both teams are/were privateers, run by dedicated men. Other than that, there is no apparent connection.
My bad. I meant the paralel that they both are privateers with a very successful past, but Tyrrell faded away and Williams seems to be on the same course.gridwalker wrote:Given the fact that Williams were the most successful team of the 90s, I'd say that a comparison to Lotus would be more fair than comparing them with Tyrrel.
Fair enough. But Tyrrell was pretty successful in their day as well. I guess both comparos have merit, in so far as any comparos have any merit at all, obviously
timbo wrote:WhiteBlue wrote:W4 turbos
Eh?
Twin two-cylinder blocks? Do I understand correctly?
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 15 guests