I remember reading somewhere the same thing.sesku wrote:I think they used 2012 KERS from Redbull.
remember that the test track has a lot of rubber down, and temperatures and other things are different...beelsebob wrote:Just for reference, yesterday's 1:22.6 if done in qualifying last year, would have been good enough for 8th on the grid. Unless everyone's made a significant time gain, I'd say Caterham should be moving out of the bottom-3 territory for sure this year.
Very true, still, a nice indication – even if they're a second down on this time, and the other teams have improved a second over last year's car (seems optimistic), it'd still be enough to get into the midfield pack, so still looks pretty good.Tozza Mazza wrote:remember that the test track has a lot of rubber down, and temperatures and other things are different...beelsebob wrote:Just for reference, yesterday's 1:22.6 if done in qualifying last year, would have been good enough for 8th on the grid. Unless everyone's made a significant time gain, I'd say Caterham should be moving out of the bottom-3 territory for sure this year.
The tyres are about 1 second faster this year they say. So that should explain things a bit.beelsebob wrote:Just for reference, yesterday's 1:22.6 if done in qualifying last year, would have been good enough for 8th on the grid. Unless everyone's made a significant time gain, I'd say Caterham should be moving out of the bottom-3 territory for sure this year.
I'd of thought that vortex would be hugging the floor rather than leaving the car straight away.boyracer94 wrote:Looks like the barge board is working hard.
Yes, maybe some more fine tuning is required? I wouldn't have thought the vortex itself can be too effective so far outboard?Owen.C93 wrote:I'd of thought that vortex would be hugging the floor rather than leaving the car straight away.boyracer94 wrote:Looks like the barge board is working hard.
Those vortices look photoshopped on for some reason.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Sparks & vortex coming off the RW
Agreed. The offside rear 'vortex' is well away from the wing, and the nearside 'vortex' sppears to be from forward of the wing. And that one in front of the rear wheel? Impossible to be a 'vortex'!n smikle wrote:
Those vortices look photoshopped on for some reason.