Marussia MR01 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.
Petroltorque
6
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:18 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby Petroltorque » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:10 pm

The problem was that Wirth Does not believe in windtunnels. This was the guy who sold a windtunnel to Prost GP that was not fit for F1 purpose.

raymondu999
138
User avatar
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:31 am

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby raymondu999 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:01 pm

Yep. He believes a well calibrated CFD kit beats a windtunnel for accuracy any day.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Owen.C93
131
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:52 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby Owen.C93 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:06 pm

In case you were wondering how they apply flo-vis.

Image
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

PNSD
4
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby PNSD » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:49 pm

raymondu999 wrote:Yep. He believes a well calibrated CFD kit beats a windtunnel for accuracy any day.


It's an issue of money, and application.

Example, there is a reason Airbus and Boeing pay well in excess of £100,000 per day for use of some wind tunnel wind tunnel facilities. 1) their wind tunnels don't provide the desirable results for accuracy and precision, and 2) they have no choice. As an airframe manufacturer, for potential customers you need to give them values of Cd that will allow them to accurately calculate fuel costs for a given engine. I dont need to stress the consequences of getting that figure wrong, the cost of which is larger, than large. I said application, and in this case the application of CFD is to accurately give you Cd, primarily viscous drag. Surely that's an oxymoron?

To cut it short, if you had enough money you would take the wind tunnel any day. With the available instrumentation these days CFD has to go a long way to kill off the tunnel.

Wirth's solutions are cost effective, and maybe in turn performance effective but not for a race car where 1 tenth can mean Q2 or Q1 :wink:

tok-tokkie
17
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:21 pm
Location: Cape Town

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby tok-tokkie » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:58 pm

Owen.C93 wrote:In case you were wondering how they apply flo-vis.

I was. Thanks for that. On the McLaren there was an arc of heavy flo-viz on the floor from below the exhaust to in front of the rear wheel. I assumed it was where the flo-viz had been painted on to see where it would flow. Others were implying that that heavy colouring showed where the exhaust had been blowing - saying the exhaust had been turned right down onto the floor (where was the main airflow around the sidepod going?). What was confusing was the entire floor was covered in flo-viz so it had also been coming from around the radiator inlet area.

pocketmoon
1
User avatar
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:14 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby pocketmoon » Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:52 pm

Well lucky me gets a visit to Marussia next week through work! We're a partner although what I do is a million miles from anything F1 related :)

Hope to get a peak at the MR-03 and a cup of tea at least :D

dice782
0
User avatar
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:50 pm
Location: UK

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby dice782 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:05 am

=D> Yes pictures will be appreciated

pitlaneimmigrant
0
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby pitlaneimmigrant » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:27 am

What area is it you work in pocketmoon?

N12ck
12
User avatar
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby N12ck » Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:21 pm

Budding F1 Engineer

ESPImperium
85
User avatar
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:08 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby ESPImperium » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:45 pm

N12ck wrote:http://en.espnf1.com/marussia/motorsport/story/71361.html

Marussia to have a smooth nose :D


Is that any surprise that they have gone this way when 35% of their workforce comes from McLaren Applied Technology.

So its The 10 Vs The 2 when it comes to nose design.

Also, can the Mods change the thread title to read MR01 for the thread title as its not the MR-03, Source: http://www.marussiaf1team.com/car/519/i ... oming-soon

Richard
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: UK

Re: Marussia MR01 Cosworth

Postby Richard » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:13 pm

ESP - Done. In future its easier if you click the "Report Post" if you want to alert the mods to anything like that.

hrt
0
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 4:09 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Marussia MR01 Cosworth

Postby hrt » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 am

Does anyone knows if Marussia passed the CT, if they didnt what are they waiting for?

Polarbear
0
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:51 am

Re: Marussia MR-03 Cosworth

Postby Polarbear » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:28 am

ESPImperium wrote:
N12ck wrote:http://en.espnf1.com/marussia/motorsport/story/71361.html

Marussia to have a smooth nose :D


Is that any surprise that they have gone this way when 35% of their workforce comes from McLaren Applied Technology.

So its The 10 Vs The 2 when it comes to nose design.

Also, can the Mods change the thread title to read MR01 for the thread title as its not the MR-03, Source: http://www.marussiaf1team.com/car/519/i ... oming-soon


What source do you have to say that 35% of Marussia's workforce is from Mclaren?

It is a load of rubbish.

Marussia have a few people from Mclaren visiting the factory once or twice a week tops, and that is the God's honest truth...

TzeiTzei
11
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:19 pm

Re: Marussia MR01 Cosworth

Postby TzeiTzei » Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:48 pm

hrt wrote:Does anyone knows if Marussia passed the CT, if they didnt what are they waiting for?


There haven't been any news about it so i guess they have. Bad news tend to get more publicity (like with HRT).

Crucial_Xtreme
436
User avatar
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:13 pm
Location: Charlotte

Re: Marussia MR01 Cosworth

Postby Crucial_Xtreme » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:08 pm

Marussia has failed crash test again. Will not make it to the second Barcelona test. Embarrasing.




Return to “F1 Car Hardware & Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 360Spider, CCBot [Bot] and 2 guests