Owen.C93 wrote:finishline wrote:Almost certainly covering a wire running from a sensor.
If it's a wire then they have one on each side of the wing. Could they be testing different leading edges, with the tape covering a temporary joint?
They've ran these wires at every test session and FP. I think they're pressure sensors.
speedsense wrote:Goes from flat wiring (outside end plate) to round twisted pair under the wing.
speedsense wrote: What is interesting is the right one, it stays as a flat piece and disappears inside of what appears to be a slot all the way across the front of the wing? The right one does not attach to the "rib" like the left one. Could be the picture quality, but it certainly appears that way...
speedsense wrote:if it was a pressure sensors the left one would be a tube, yet you can see the silhouette of the wires inside. IMHO
Jef Patat wrote:@ speedsense
I don't see what you see![]()


speedsense wrote:Goes from flat wiring (outside end plate) to round twisted pair under the wing.
I have done this very thing a few times when the required route was across body work or wings, it's quite simple really, remove a chunk of insulation, spread the wires out side by side, re-enclose with some medium to hold the wiring, tape to the surface. It's used more often than you may think. Many instances on race cars require custom wiring, especially on the outside of a car. BTW, if you do this on carbon fiber, it needs to be insulated from the carbon as it's a conductor.Wiring won't go from one type to another, that's just not done. Unless you mean there are several cables under the tape, but then it doesn't matter if they're twisted.
speedsense wrote: What is interesting is the right one, it stays as a flat piece and disappears inside of what appears to be a slot all the way across the front of the wing? The right one does not attach to the "rib" like the left one. Could be the picture quality, but it certainly appears that way...
Where do you see that?
Why should a pressure sensor have tubes? It can be just a very small piezo.
fiohaa wrote:this is an extract from mark hughes article off sky:
It's believed McLaren was taking advantage of the production tolerance allowed for the floor - which has to be flat but which is allowed a few millimetres tolerance - by considering the splitter as part of the floor. The clarification put a stop to this. McLaren insists this had no serious impact upon the car's aerodynamic performance, but others are less sure. Could it have allowed just enough rake on the car for even Jenson to get the front tyres up to temperature? It's only a theory. But at the time of writing, theories were all even Button and the team had.'
Users browsing this forum: Carlo's, Godius, Google [Bot], kwanchepan, Neno, techF1LES, Yandex [Bot] and 16 guests