Neno wrote:Yes, you said yourself that Mclaren will have such system in Spa and race withGood for them then, it would be great for championship, but you said that mclaren will make same job until Spa (even if factory are closed) what lotus made in half season.
This:
Why not? McLaren have been closed this week... That's only 1 week of closure remaining, then 3 weeks of time they can work
beelsebob wrote:Neno wrote:Yes, you said yourself that Mclaren will have such system in Spa and race withGood for them then, it would be great for championship, but you said that mclaren will make same job until Spa (even if factory are closed) what lotus made in half season.
This:
Why not? McLaren have been closed this week... That's only 1 week of closure remaining, then 3 weeks of time they can work
Uhhh, you really haven't answered any of my questions...
1) *I* did not say McLaren would turn up with it, I said they had 3 weeks more work before the next race.
2) You seem to be insistent on the assumption that McLaren have not been working on such a system before this week, let alone before seeing Lotus' system, why is this?
Neno wrote:beelsebob wrote:Neno wrote:Yes, you said yourself that Mclaren will have such system in Spa and race withGood for them then, it would be great for championship, but you said that mclaren will make same job until Spa (even if factory are closed) what lotus made in half season.
This:
Why not? McLaren have been closed this week... That's only 1 week of closure remaining, then 3 weeks of time they can work
Uhhh, you really haven't answered any of my questions...
1) *I* did not say McLaren would turn up with it, I said they had 3 weeks more work before the next race.
2) You seem to be insistent on the assumption that McLaren have not been working on such a system before this week, let alone before seeing Lotus' system, why is this?
1. from your post it sounded like they would sure turn up with it. again you comparing that in 3 weeks work will have something what lotus needed 5 months at least.
2. we know that mclaren said they been working on similar system, but if you closely read article they said something in style, we testing with enginers in CFD, wind tunnel what performances can such system bring. they said nothing about bringing such system there, nothing about is in devolopment, even if they bring in some miracle system they will not race with him for sure (again in article said something like lotus was example that is not easy to put such system in car and will work 100% percent, they needed to test device on two previous GP). please dont make me to repeat myself again.
hardingfv32 wrote:westech wrote: so trust me the development has been on going for some time.DDRS will be on the menu for SPA & monza.
Why would anyone proceed with DDRS? What do we have to indicate that it has any value at all? The only team using it is certainly not doing well.
Brian
hardingfv32 wrote:westech wrote: so trust me the development has been on going for some time.DDRS will be on the menu for SPA & monza.
Why would anyone proceed with DDRS? What do we have to indicate that it has any value at all? The only team using it is certainly not doing well.
Brian
hardingfv32 wrote:westech wrote: so trust me the development has been on going for some time.DDRS will be on the menu for SPA & monza.
Why would anyone proceed with DDRS? What do we have to indicate that it has any value at all? The only team using it is certainly not doing well.
Brian
Neno wrote:beelsebob wrote:Neno wrote:Yes, you said yourself that Mclaren will have such system in Spa and race withGood for them then, it would be great for championship, but you said that mclaren will make same job until Spa (even if factory are closed) what lotus made in half season.
This:
Why not? McLaren have been closed this week... That's only 1 week of closure remaining, then 3 weeks of time they can work
Uhhh, you really haven't answered any of my questions...
1) *I* did not say McLaren would turn up with it, I said they had 3 weeks more work before the next race.
2) You seem to be insistent on the assumption that McLaren have not been working on such a system before this week, let alone before seeing Lotus' system, why is this?
1. from your post it sounded like they would sure turn up with it. again you comparing that in 3 weeks work will have something what lotus needed 5 months at least.
2. we know that mclaren said they been working on similar system, but if you closely read article they said something in style, we testing with enginers in CFD, wind tunnel what performances can such system bring. they said nothing about bringing such system there, nothing about is in devolopment, even if they bring in some miracle system they will not race with him for sure (again in article said something like lotus was example that is not easy to put such system in car and will work 100% percent, they needed to test device on two previous GP). please dont make me to repeat myself again.
hardingfv32 wrote:Huntresa wrote:Cause it might not be a DDRS but it might be what Lotus has ?
What Lotus 'might', if not DRS related, could have been done years ago. Why are we seeing it now if it so effective?
Brian
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], raymondu999 and 15 guests