Vodafone McLaren MP4-27 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:49 pm

beelsebob wrote:They can't be the exhausts, they break this rule:
The entire circumference of the exit should lie on a single plane normal to the tailpipe axis and be located at the rearmost extremity of the last 100mm of the tailpipe.


(part of 5.8.3)

Yes that is the exhaust, they point up and inward. But expect the exhaust to change.
Crucial_Xtreme
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Location: Charlotte

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:49 pm

thestig84 wrote:
sAx wrote:
thestig84 wrote:Well it looks like my person got the intakes right again and nose being similar. Also see why he didnt have too much else to say...looks similar but very nice. Good job Mclaren


Don't quite see the aggressive design philosophy hinted at or areas that will raise questions around legality. Maybe that is to be played out during testing next week.

It looks nice, but....?

sAx


Everything I heard pointed at conservative evolution but people like to get carried away. If your referring to the removed autosport aggressive design/legality story I think that was a dudd quote and should be ignored.


Certainly would like to understand chassis design to maximise mass flow to claw back downforce and yet meet nose height restriction from new regs. Comparing Gascoyne's CT-01 which may not actually be a useful comparator, MP4-27 looks very conservative (at this stage).

sAx
Integrity, Trust, Respect.

Follow me: http://twitter.com/#!/sAx247
sAx
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2007

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:51 pm

"Exhaust" panel is removeable so likely a dummy.

Engine cover is also a dummy as the hole at back is sealed.

If the exhaust is real it could possibly be using a venturi effect??
jamesalexw
 
Joined: 12 Jul 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:51 pm

Image

Image

Image
Joie de vivre
 
Joined: 2 Sep 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:52 pm

Gridlock wrote:
beelsebob wrote:They can't be the exhausts, they break this rule:
The entire circumference of the exit should lie on a single plane normal to the tailpipe axis and be located at the rearmost extremity of the last 100mm of the tailpipe.


(part of 5.8.3)


Does "normal" mean perpendicular then? Because I don't see how they do unless it does - I take it to mean the exit must have one face only, no shaping.

It means that it's normal vector (a vector perpendicular to the plane) must be parallel to the direction of the tailpipe axis. It's the "lie on a single plane" part that it seems to violate though – unless it's an optical illusion, it seems to curve over the surface there.
beelsebob
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Cupertino, California

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:52 pm

Could this be a lateral rethink of the 'octopus' exhaust?

I thought the pipe had to be exposed.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute
Giblet
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Location: Downtown Canada

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:53 pm

Image
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:58 pm

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Joie de vivre on Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joie de vivre
 
Joined: 2 Sep 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:59 pm

Is it just me or do the sidepods look even fatter than the 26 towards the rear? :wtf: :wtf:
ajdavison2
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:59 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:02 pm

Much more rake that initially last year.

I hope they can tighten up the rear packaging before the first race. Im expecting a lot of that car to change.

I have a theory on the exhausts. McLaren think another team is doing something similar, but less extreme. They launch an extreme version, FIA quickly move to ban it using a technical directive. The other team looses there advantage ?

What do you reckon?
Twitter @ledzep4pm
ledzep4pm
 
Joined: 21 Oct 2011

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:04 pm

I agree, I believe we've been sold a dummy on many things. Below is a HUGE picture of the MP4-27.

http://twitpic.com/8eb64c/full
Crucial_Xtreme
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Location: Charlotte

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:05 pm

Cup-holders for the rear wheel men during pitstops. Nothing else makes sense.

Definitely more rake, even in obvious "we made this out of balsa" form as seen here.

Pull-rod rear end.

Very square inlets, aren't they?
#58
Gridlock
 
Joined: 27 Jan 2012

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:07 pm

DOn't know why but something tells me this isn't the final nose...
Afterburner
 
Joined: 23 Feb 2009

Post Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:10 pm

Gridlock wrote:And what's this?

Image

I'm wondering if they're using the front wing f-duct idea to push air through to the splitter somehow.
beelsebob
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Cupertino, California

PreviousNext

Return to F1 Car Hardware & Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Carlo's, CCBot [Bot], cobart, Cold Fussion, e30ernest, imightbewrong, k.ko100v, lotus7, piston, SectorOne and 67 guests