Mandrake wrote:mozza_84 wrote:what amazes me is that redbull have got 2 concepts already and the season hasnt even started. how in the hell are they controlling cost. give over there full of crap cant wait to see how they get round the audit this year but then again there was a reason why they left fota
I doubt that money is a reason here. RedBull will have had THIS concept from the beginning. I doubt it's been copied off other rivals, the solutions are just much too thought through.
The launch car was an RB7 with RB8 front, RB8 sidepod packaging and RB7 / RB5 style sidepod end and exhaust. Not too difficult to hack the car together.
While all the teams talked about trying different exhaust positions, RedBull actually have something different! I like that. And the way this looks is just astonishing....
hardingfv32 wrote:Mandrake wrote: RedBull will have had THIS concept from the beginning. I doubt it's been copied off other rivals, the solutions are just much too thought through.
Sorry to burst your bubble, if you come out after a rival with the same idea it is 'copying'. RB is no exception to this rule.
Mr.G wrote:And new chasiss?
bot6 wrote:Money...you don't even attempt to go into the amount of carbon fiber complex shaped detail of the RB8 V2 if you don't have money to spare.
strad wrote:Have to agree with hardingfv32...You don't need anything fancy...just a mold. I have a friend who lays up Carbon Fiber parts for FF,,,dragsters and others.
Crucial_Xtreme wrote:In this picture it looks like air/gasses can get to the sides of the diffuser by rear tyre.
hardingfv32 wrote:But why move the outlet farther away if you are targeting the sides of the diffuser? The exhaust plume must diffuse the farther out you get.
Users browsing this forum: acidtech, basti313, beaums, BenjaminF1, CCBot [Bot], FoxHound, gary123, RSS Junkie [Deamon], serakar, Sevach, Tweetmeme [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 50 guests