Mercedes AMG F1 W03

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Anything related to a specific race should go in the appropriate race thread.

Post Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:56 am

raymondu999 wrote:
roadwarrior wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:The Lotus has no exhaust trickery and is still very good - I still don't think exhausts are the answer. Exhausts could maybe be the straw that breaks the camel's back, but I think there's also a lot to gain through a more "organic" development of the car too.

True, but Red Bull seemed to find a junk of time in Valencia with their new rear floor arrangement so perhaps there is something in that exhaust setup. But I agree that Merc need to fully understand their car, tires and setup before throwing another variable of exhaust configuration into the mix.

I'm not sure I agree with that. The exhaust portion of the Red Bull wasn't changed in Valencia - it was the tunnel underneath the exhaust. Red Bull's exhaust remained pretty much unchanged for Valencia. So in effect it was also an upgrade on the more "fundamental" aerodynamics of the car.


I disagree, both the exhaust ramp and the outlet itself was very different from previous iterations.
also their previous versions off the tunnel weren't working correctly so the airflow around the lower sidepods was disrupting their exhaust flow before valencia.

getting a bit off topic now though...
rayden
 
Joined: 17 Mar 2010

Post Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:52 am

Doh, would appear I'm wrong (hands up) can't get them all right eh LOL
Catch me on Twitter https://twitter.com/SomersF1 or the blog http://www.SomersF1.co.uk
I tweet tech images for Sutton Images
Matt Somers
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2009

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:40 pm

RedBull's new tunnel upgrade may be useful with our mini-DDD, what do you think guys ?
Ozan
 
Joined: 5 Jan 2012

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:53 pm

They only have a tunnel because they need to re coup losses from installing an exhaust ramp, Merc don't have that problem.
Owen.C93
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:10 pm

Owen.C93 wrote:They only have a tunnel because they need to re coup losses from installing an exhaust ramp, Merc don't have that problem.


The tunnel might be better then an open coke bottle area.
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:15 pm

as i understand the coke bottle is there to minimise convergeance of flow between engine cover sidepods and rear tyre -and is in a ways the equivalent of a high nose ? I don´t think the tunnels can provide any of that it´s a completly different matter of connecting flow coming from the front wing to the diffuser.
marcush.
 
Joined: 9 Mar 2004

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:48 pm

Huntresa wrote:
Owen.C93 wrote:They only have a tunnel because they need to re coup losses from installing an exhaust ramp, Merc don't have that problem.


The tunnel might be better then an open coke bottle area.

They could use an RB7 type tunnel if they wanted. But there's not much need because they dont blow the starter hole, they just control the flow over the center of the diffuser. I don't believe it's really that significant, it's just a little extra body work that allows them to run a slightly higher and more profiled gurney.
Owen.C93
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

Post Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:24 pm

Owen.C93 wrote:
Huntresa wrote:
Owen.C93 wrote:They only have a tunnel because they need to re coup losses from installing an exhaust ramp, Merc don't have that problem.


The tunnel might be better then an open coke bottle area.

They could use an RB7 type tunnel if they wanted. But there's not much need because they dont blow the starter hole, they just control the flow over the center of the diffuser. I don't believe it's really that significant, it's just a little extra body work that allows them to run a slightly higher and more profiled gurney.


they are doing that, the outer tunnel blows the starter motor hole,
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:16 am

N12ck wrote:
Owen.C93 wrote:
Huntresa wrote:The tunnel might be better then an open coke bottle area.

They could use an RB7 type tunnel if they wanted. But there's not much need because they dont blow the starter hole, they just control the flow over the center of the diffuser. I don't believe it's really that significant, it's just a little extra body work that allows them to run a slightly higher and more profiled gurney.


they are doing that, the outer tunnel blows the starter motor hole,

W03?
Owen.C93
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:46 am

RB7 had a tunnel? :O
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:36 am

Huntresa wrote:RB7 had a tunnel? :O


yes, http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2011/06/0 ... -analysis/
scarbs
 
Joined: 8 Oct 2003
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:54 am

Would hardly compare that to this tunnel. thats just 2 ducts at the end so the air actually went into the starter hole.
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:09 pm

Owen.C93 wrote:W03?


sorry thought u were on about rb8 at that moment,
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:43 pm

Huntresa wrote:Would hardly compare that to this tunnel. thats just 2 ducts at the end so the air actually went into the starter hole.

Which is why it would be more suitable to the W03, putting a tunnel in the middle of the floor for no reason would make no sense on the W03 unlike the RB7 ducts which could work.
Owen.C93
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

Post Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:47 pm

Any pics from Silverstone?
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare
Morteza
 
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea...

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One cars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jashko, khaliweed, kwanchepan, McMrocks, Morteza, PhillipM, RicerDude, Zava, zoro_f1 and 43 guests