turbof1 wrote:Most innovative car until now. By far.
Whats innovative about it, except slim sidepods? It looks quite boring frankly.

bhallg2k wrote:n smikle wrote:[...]
Those side-pods are just crazy, man. I still can't wrap my head around how they will get those tiny radiators to cool anything at all!
Can we still call those sidepods? If anything, they're subtlepods.
Coefficient wrote:They appear small because they waist towards the top instead of the bottom which deceives the eye when one is so used to seeing it the other way round. Its probably to lower the CofG by having the bulk of the cooling gear lower down.
ecapox wrote: I highly doubt any of these launch cars have an engine fitted or much of the internals for that matter. I guess if one wanted to they could make cheap bodywork for the launch that was nothing like what they will run at the first test. Not to say sauber are doing that but damn those side pods are tiny.
Coefficient wrote:bhallg2k wrote:n smikle wrote:[...]
Those side-pods are just crazy, man. I still can't wrap my head around how they will get those tiny radiators to cool anything at all!
Can we still call those sidepods? If anything, they're subtlepods.
They appear small because they waist towards the top instead of the bottom which deceives the eye when one is so used to seeing it the other way round. Its probably to lower the CofG by having the bulk of the cooling gear lower down.

afiq wrote:
Sauber made their gearbox casing themselves? Different suspension attachment points.
F2012 and C31 look fairly the same. This year they were completely different.

korzeniow wrote:Another hi-res photos of the car:
turbof1 wrote:Rikhart wrote:turbof1 wrote:Most innovative car until now. By far.
Whats innovative about it, except slim sidepods? It looks quite boring frankly.
You are joking right?
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], hollus, k.ko100v, n smikle, Seamus and 23 guests