Red Bull RB10 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
ringo
227
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:As we can see from the above post the Red Bull problems have very little to do with the ICE and practically everything is related to the ERS.

The issues that are described are of a nature that can be eliminated by running the ERS, the turbo and the ICE together in a mule. Ferrari difinitely did that and one has to assume that MERC also had a mule.

Only Renault were dumb enough to believe in father Xmas and did no mule testing. It really shows now that they are have so many basic issues get got ironed out by their competitors a long time ago.


This shows once again that you have to go to the edge of the rules and use everything available from the black and grey area. Only then you have a decent chance to be competitive. Red Bull screwed up when they decided to rely on Renault for a 2014 engine. They should have made it themselves. The opportunity was there with P.U.R.E. Bad luck they took the wrong turn. The RB10 would have been a much better car from the start. As it stands we know practically nothing about it's competitiveness.
Mule testing? I though each team had an advanced dyno, that made running the engine on track unnecessary? :wink:

Anyway, looking at the videos, the redbull still looks like the fastest thing in the corners. Maybe for a competitive season it's good that they have engine problems. The other cars look like gondolas compared to how the rb10 is going through the turns.
For Sure!!

User avatar
Helios
20
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 14:52

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

ringo wrote:
Mule testing? I though each team had an advanced dyno, that made running the engine on track unnecessary? :wink:

Anyway, looking at the videos, the redbull still looks like the fastest thing in the corners. Maybe for a competitive season it's good that they have engine problems. The other cars look like gondolas compared to how the rb10 is going through the turns.
What kind of videos were you watching? Could you share them, please?

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

ringo wrote:Anyway, looking at the videos, the redbull still looks like the fastest thing in the corners. Maybe for a competitive season it's good that they have engine problems. The other cars look like gondolas compared to how the rb10 is going through the turns.
Not having an engine that actually pushes the car should help with it, ain't it?

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Helios wrote:
ringo wrote:
Mule testing? I though each team had an advanced dyno, that made running the engine on track unnecessary? :wink:

Anyway, looking at the videos, the redbull still looks like the fastest thing in the corners. Maybe for a competitive season it's good that they have engine problems. The other cars look like gondolas compared to how the rb10 is going through the turns.
What kind of videos were you watching? Could you share them, please?
Button made a comment to this, he said the Rb10 passed him with incredible poise in high speed turn 11... he had never seen this before..wwhatever this means.

http://translate.google.de/translate?sl ... ml&act=url
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
Helios
20
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 14:52

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

FrukostScones wrote:
Helios wrote:
ringo wrote:
Mule testing? I though each team had an advanced dyno, that made running the engine on track unnecessary? :wink:

Anyway, looking at the videos, the redbull still looks like the fastest thing in the corners. Maybe for a competitive season it's good that they have engine problems. The other cars look like gondolas compared to how the rb10 is going through the turns.
What kind of videos were you watching? Could you share them, please?
Button made a comment to this, he said the Rb10 passed him with incredible poise in high speed turn 11... he had never seen this before..wwhatever this means.

http://translate.google.de/translate?sl ... ml&act=url
Button was on Mediums, while Ricciardo was on Softs. Plus we don't know anything about fuel loads.
However, this doesn't mean I don't believe that the RB10 is a beast, once it gets running. Which is worrying.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Helios wrote: Button was on Mediums, while Ricciardo was on Softs. Plus we don't know anything about fuel loads.
However, this doesn't mean I don't believe that the RB10 is a beast, once it gets running. Which is worrying.
Peter windsor confirms what button said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQLLdLlE ... be&t=1m45s

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

jagunx51 wrote:
Thunders wrote:
Jv12 wrote:Vía @motorpasionf1: Helmut Marko has said there is a 165 hp difference between the Mercedes and Renault engine.
AMuS reported that too, but that was related to the Complete ERS not working, which is that Power Number. Nothing to do with the Renault Engine.

Hmmmm......can they run a race distance with only V6 power ?
maybe if they run very slow. if my math is half right the 2MJ kinectic energy per lap adds up to something like an
equivalent of 7kg gasoline, assuming the MGU-H adds 10% efficiency that's another 10kg

so not only will they be done on power they will also use ~15-20% more fuel

User avatar
Shakeman
33
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 13:31
Location: UK

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Will the RB be a beast when it is repackaged?

Seems to me that it is a more optimal aero package that doesn't provide enough cooling, I dare say other teams could do a similar job of aero and cook their cars too.

It'll be interesting to see if the RB's coke bottle remains as slender when they overcome their cooling issues.

User avatar
Blackout
1563
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

What cooling issues ? :roll: still talking about cooling? cooling is not the problem. Are Horner, Taffin and Marko lying? and do you really believe the 10mm wide cooling pipes they added yesterday is the ultimate solution that helped them do 66 laps? and do you think the car that did 66 laps yeterday, failed to do more than 0,5 laps today because of cooling ?

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Blackout wrote:What cooling issues ? :roll: still talking about cooling? cooling is not the problem. Are Horner, Taffin and Marko lying? and do you really believe the 10mm wide cooling pipes they added yesterday is the ultimate solution that helped them do 66 laps? and do you think the car that did 66 laps yeterday, failed to do more than 0,5 laps today because of cooling ?
No, it's clear there is far more too it. A lot of the talk about cooling is because that's the line that the journalists are taking, but there must be further issues. But the cooling is definitely compounding their problems.

Manoah2u
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

if the engine or power unit parts ends up being overheated [smoke is a clear indicator of that] then its clear as day still that they are having still cooling issues. the question is though, why?

is it 'simple' packaging? perhaps you can compare it to a computer. the same 'engine' [thus processor etc] in a very very tight package will get hotter then a casing where hot air can ventilate through better. now, that's a relative simple issue, but let's keep this thought in the back of the mind.

now we have 2 exactly the same computers. literally. but, we decide to overclock one of them both. the overclocked one is [much] faster, but, it needs proper cooling.

now let's combine these 2. red bull might just have found a way of 'overclocking' the package - and are running into packaging problems regarding proper cooling.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

According to Vettel the first failure today was the battery pack which was then replaced. The second failure was mechanical but he didn't elaborate on that.

User avatar
stuartpengs
1
Joined: 04 Dec 2013, 03:07

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Manoah2u wrote:if the engine or power unit parts ends up being overheated [smoke is a clear indicator of that] then its clear as day still that they are having still cooling issues. the question is though, why?

is it 'simple' packaging? perhaps you can compare it to a computer. the same 'engine' [thus processor etc] in a very very tight package will get hotter then a casing where hot air can ventilate through better. now, that's a relative simple issue, but let's keep this thought in the back of the mind.

now we have 2 exactly the same computers. literally. but, we decide to overclock one of them both. the overclocked one is [much] faster, but, it needs proper cooling.

now let's combine these 2. red bull might just have found a way of 'overclocking' the package - and are running into packaging problems regarding proper cooling.
Not sure about that analogy, to overclock a computer CPU or GPU you increase frequency, to apply a similar thought process to a power train you would have to increase revolutions, which can't be done as far as the ICE is concerned as it's limited to 15,000rpm. With Renault supplying the complete package, one would assume they're the same specification as the other Renault engined cars, but the cooling problems seem to be more chronic on the RB10, which would suggest a packaging issue.

simieski
simieski
9
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 18:45

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

myurr wrote:According to Vettel the first failure today was the battery pack which was then replaced. The second failure was mechanical but he didn't elaborate on that.
From: http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/26400175
The team said that a battery problem had stopped Vettel out on the track, and that the pit-lane stop was caused by a leak which damaged the car sufficiently to prevent him from going out again.
Thank you to God for making me an Atheist - Ricky Gervais.

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Bahrain - Final Day

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image