Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
User avatar
lio007
314
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 23:03
Location: Austria

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Before the season RBR expected to be competitive in the second half of 2016. Nobody could ever thought to exceed their expectations that much.

If you compare the pre season-spec of Mercedes, Ferrari and McLaren with their latest iterations from Silverstone, you can see really A LOT OF differences and updates.

The RB12 is pretty much the opposite. More or less pre season configuration. Do you think RBR will start an update firework after the summer break ... because they originally thought to be competitive since then.

Ozan
9
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 01:50

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

I think they are gonna shift the development attention to 2017 car before the summer break

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

lio007 wrote:Before the season RBR expected to be competitive in the second half of 2016. Nobody could ever thought to exceed their expectations that much.

If you compare the pre season-spec of Mercedes, Ferrari and McLaren with their latest iterations from Silverstone, you can see really A LOT OF differences and updates.

The RB12 is pretty much the opposite. More or less pre season configuration. Do you think RBR will start an update firework after the summer break ... because they originally thought to be competitive since then.
You see less changes.on the RB12 because the red bull is much further into diminishing returns
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Pierce89 wrote:
lio007 wrote:You see less changes.on the RB12 because the red bull is much further into diminishing returns
They are preparing for 2017 since april! They also told media (afair ~2 weeks ago) that there will be no more big upgrades beside the obvious Spa/Monza packages.

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

From P. Lowe:
"It’s interesting that Red Bull are constantly peddling a story about the low power they’ve got, but just to set the record straight at this event as they often do, they chose to run a higher level of wing than we did.

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merce ... er-798050/
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

User avatar
GPR-A duplicate2
64
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 09:00

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

SectorOne wrote:From P. Lowe:
"It’s interesting that Red Bull are constantly peddling a story about the low power they’ve got, but just to set the record straight at this event as they often do, they chose to run a higher level of wing than we did.

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merce ... er-798050/
This is really interesting bit. For a moment, if we assume that there isn't much between Mercedes and Renault PUs and as Paddy says, RBR is running more wing than Mercedes, which means relatively more downforce on RBR, but the point is, they still are quite far behind on the sector times. If you look at the way the Mercedes car was planted and flowing through those high downforce section, no one can say they had any kind of downforce deficit.
Now, the general understanding is, you look at a car's aero profile and then say, Oh, they have bolted a lot of downforce (more wing). So, it makes me curious now that, if W07's profile doesn't say, they have bolted a lot of wing (aero intensive), but they still manage to out do RBR, who have indeed bolted more wing on. Then either Mercedes are immensely maturing in finding highly efficient downforce, without using a lot of aero bits, that then also allows them better straight line speed, OR, they are now so evolved in their Mechanical grip that, the car is more depending on that Mechanical grip than aero grip and RBR team doesn't have such kind of mechanical expertise in their ranks and hence have to depend on those aero bits to generate downforce, which trades them a significant drag that takes away the straight line speed.

Image

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

It's a non deniable fact mercedes PU is MUCH better in probably every aspect there is. What lowe is implying with that statement is some next level smoke and mirrors.

Why didn't he come out with that statement after baku when wing levels were reversed and still merc was far ahead.

Or austria.

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

SectorOne wrote:From P. Lowe:
"It’s interesting that Red Bull are constantly peddling a story about the low power they’ve got, but just to set the record straight at this event as they often do, they chose to run a higher level of wing than we did.

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merce ... er-798050/
Paddy probably was at vacation when they raced in Baku. :lol:

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Silverstone Test Day 2:

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
lio007
314
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 23:03
Location: Austria

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Looks like they've tested a smaller cooling outlet:
2nd Day Silverstone Test:
Image

Image

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

The angle of the sensor heads behind the rear tyre suggests what the flow structures are. Interesting.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Juzh wrote:It's a non deniable fact mercedes PU is MUCH better in probably every aspect there is. What lowe is implying with that statement is some next level smoke and mirrors.

Why didn't he come out with that statement after baku when wing levels were reversed and still merc was far ahead.

Or austria.
It's a bit of a "burn". Red Bull complained a lot last year, even going as far as saying(if I remember correctly) they would be World Champions with a better engine.

The Renault engine clearly has improved compared to last year, still, Red Bull isn't anywhere closer.

In a tl;dr sense the article simply says "Yo Red Bull, our aero is better than yours as well"
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

User avatar
gandharva
252
Joined: 06 Feb 2012, 15:19
Location: Munich

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

wesley123 wrote:The Renault engine clearly has improved compared to last year, still, Red Bull isn't anywhere closer.
You should check your facts... Just compare last years time differences to Mercs in quali and also check the improvement teams made on every track compared to last year.
wesley123 wrote:"Yo Red Bull, our aero is better than yours as well"
Image

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

Really guys? A PU bro-down? In a car thread?
#AeroFrodo

wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Red Bull RB12 TAG-Heuer

Post

gandharva wrote:
wesley123 wrote:The Renault engine clearly has improved compared to last year, still, Red Bull isn't anywhere closer.
You should check your facts... Just compare last years time differences to Mercs in quali and also check the improvement teams made on every track compared to last year.
wesley123 wrote:"Yo Red Bull, our aero is better than yours as well"
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/69474437.jpg
Yes, Mercedes out-developed Red Bull, that was the whole point of the argument.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

Post Reply