manchild wrote:Old school? It is the first modern car with raised nose with no struts to carry front wing but one blade incorporated as wing carrier. Definitely best suspension geometry of all keel less cars so far (wishbones horizontal) + very low front end of chassis and nose meaning lower overall COG .
I agree that it looks as the mid section of rear blade is choked by nose BUT we have no idea how nose looks from below. What if only vertical sides and top are as it seams while in fact nose and chassis bottom are shaped as a diffuser? Ok, that would make it two-keel car than. I bet nose isn't flat at its bottom.
modbaraban wrote:Arrrgh!!! I hoped to see a new paint scheme
manchild wrote:Here is what I had in mind.
Longitudinal cross section of nose

Spencifer_Murphy wrote:I knew it! Thanks scarbs. (I'd like to claim it was a most intelligent guess on my part - but really it was pure blind luck.)
Scarbs, you said the "tunnel" (if we can call it that) stretches back to the wishbones. But at that point how does it stop - or rather, how does it join the rest of the nose (or the "twin-keels") if you like? Is it a smooth gradient that eventually joins the rest of the nose?
Kinda like on Machild's sketech, where he draws the tunnel sloping up away from the apparent sides of the nose, does it do the same thing at the aft section of this tunnel.
Hope I've been clear enough lol. Sorry if not.

manchild, Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:07 pm wrote:I agree that it looks as the mid section of rear blade is choked by nose BUT we have no idea how nose looks from below. What if only vertical sides and top are as it seams while in fact nose and chassis bottom are shaped as a diffuser? Ok, that would make it two-keel car than. I bet nose isn't flat at its bottom.

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Maynard G. Krebs, Mui and 21 guests