allstaruk08 wrote:have we had the secret about this car yet ?
Sorry, no, ringo is busy making it up^W^W^W I mean precisely phrasing the english used.
beelsebob wrote:allstaruk08 wrote:have we had the secret about this car yet ?
Sorry, no, ringo is busy making it up^W^W^W I mean precisely phrasing the english used.
Robbobnob wrote:dont rush him guys, i can imagine it take a while to make this stuff up... i mean urgh uhm...
Kidding... in regards to that car im not sure what it was i just found it on reddit.
myurr wrote:beelsebob wrote:allstaruk08 wrote:have we had the secret about this car yet ?
Sorry, no, ringo is busy making it up^W^W^W I mean precisely phrasing the english used.
I think the problem is that he probably spotted something common aerodynamically across all the recent Red Bulls and thought he'd found a secret, only for the RB8 to not have it.
Tim.Wright wrote:RB7ate9 wrote:Considering that you are running CFD analysis should give anyone pause until the relevant figures are on the table.
Any monkey can "run" a CFD program
ringo wrote:myurr wrote:I think the problem is that he probably spotted something common aerodynamically across all the recent Red Bulls and thought he'd found a secret, only for the RB8 to not have it.
Nope nope. Something i realized, then tested. It's not a blind shot in the dark.
I never thought it a secret until noticing what it's worth down-force wise, and the fact that no one else has it. It's really not complicated at all and that's what makes it so hard to see.
I would like to run more CFD on the F1 model i am building so it could be explained easier, that's the delay really coupled with the fact we haven't had a race yet.
ringo wrote:Their sidepods have an 11% downforce advantage. That's not down to any gimmicks or fan-dangles.
Users browsing this forum: AddThis [Crawler], CCBot [Bot], elise787, kwanchepan, timbo and 10 guests