siskue2005 wrote:simieski wrote:richard_leeds wrote:Thanks for the quote. Shame people slammed the Merc team for letting Schumacher down when in fact it was a mistake by Koabayashi.
I don't think it was kobayashi who turned his engine off![]()
With ref to the eng overheat...
Considering that Schumacher was one of the last drivers on the grid this lends itself to a car issue or either an improper parade lap in car procedure causing the overheat.
He turned off his engine coz of over heating
richard_leeds wrote:Have you read the previous posts?
He turned the engine off because that was the routine in the old days.
SiLo wrote:Only just got to watch Hamiltons pole lap. Did anyone else think it was really scruffy? Loads of oversteer moments, missing apex's... And still almost 1/2 a second faster than anyone else. Scary.
SiLo wrote:Only just got to watch Hamiltons pole lap. Did anyone else think it was really scruffy? Loads of oversteer moments, missing apex's... And still almost 1/2 a second faster than anyone else. Scary.
Ral wrote:I think he was saying the car started off with understeer and as the race progressed, he needed to induce understeer. It confused me, as I'm not entirely sure why someone would want to induce understeer, certainly if that someone is Hamilton. But perhaps the long corners require a setup that felt like it caused understeer in the shorter ones?
GrizzleBoy wrote:You cant really induce under steer. The car either turns in or it doesn't. Deciding to make a car under steer is basically just not turning the car in properly.
Redragon wrote:Shumacher not only switched off his engine, apparently he position himself on place back.
Not giving enough space for the 22 cars, that's why the position lap was repeated.
Or at least it is was saying the spanish press.
So shumacher mistake all from begining
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests