Italian GP 2009 - Monza

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

deus1066 wrote:I agree. Though hopefully with the refuelling ban for next year we'll get to see a bit more overtaking, as cars which qualify high up with good performance in light qualifying trim, may not be as quick when laden in race trim compared some others behind them. Also differences in efficiency may lead to different fuel weights and therefore another differentiator. Though this is probably all wishful thinking.
If lapping counts as overtaking, you will see plenty of that next year with three new "cannon-fodder" teams on the grid. First races are gonna be a mess.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

Whilhelm
Whilhelm
0
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 05:08

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

3rd is a lot better than not finishing at all. Hamilton could have kept it on the road if he just calmed down and realized that there was no chance of him catching Button.

Super racing
Super racing
0
Joined: 07 Sep 2009, 20:34

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Whilhelm wrote:3rd is a lot better than not finishing at all. Hamilton could have kept it on the road if he just calmed down and realized that there was no chance of him catching Button.
There was a chance, and he did not even have to pass him, just outdrag him out of the parabolica to the start/finish... and he had KERS to help him with that. He was already within 1 second and was catching JB's draft.

Not much of a chance, but a slight one, losing 3rd place for a driver out of WDC contention is not that big a deal.

Ogami musashi
Ogami musashi
32
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:57

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

xpensive wrote:
deus1066 wrote:I agree. Though hopefully with the refuelling ban for next year we'll get to see a bit more overtaking, as cars which qualify high up with good performance in light qualifying trim, may not be as quick when laden in race trim compared some others behind them. Also differences in efficiency may lead to different fuel weights and therefore another differentiator. Though this is probably all wishful thinking.
If lapping counts as overtaking, you will see plenty of that next year with three new "cannon-fodder" teams on the grid. First races are gonna be a mess.

Well, the only hope (realistically) is that in race you have more lap time differences than now, because the problem is, if you stay with the typical lap time differences of .4 seconds average we see this year then it is not enough to overtake.

Now without KERS for all we may see more of the benefits of OWG.

I say again than i do think the OWG did a good job at it shows, this year many variables went into play and kind of alleviated the overtaking plans the two main for me being KERS and lap time differences much smaller than last year (in race, but the bottom line is that i think OWG did not set aggressive enough lap time difference goals. they aimed at 0.5 but that's not enough because as you close in the advantage drops smoothly instead of abruptly. That means you have less and less closing in speed as you go closer to the other car, this kind of prevents you to go as close as you would wish.

Super racing
Super racing
0
Joined: 07 Sep 2009, 20:34

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

DDD is a much bigger problem than KERS

Ogami musashi
Ogami musashi
32
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:57

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

There is no scientific proof of that.


Unless you tell me you've run a wind tunnel and/or CFD study to analyse the wake signature.


The fact that KERS prevents a car (non equipped) that got closer to overtake in straight line is theoretically proven.

And the sole fact that lap time difference is a critical parameter for overtaking aero revamp was the basis of the OWG work.

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Super racing wrote:DDD is a much bigger problem than KERS
The DDD made no difference. All the teams confirmed it.
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

noname
noname
10
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 11:55
Location: EU

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Super racing wrote:Not much of a chance, but a slight one, losing 3rd place for a driver out of WDC contention is not that big a deal.
for the driver maybe not but his team is fighting for 3rd place in constructors championships with its arch rival in red cars.

in the last 4 races Kimi alone got 30 points vs. 31 grabbed by silver duo. there are only 4 races left, if guys from Woking are going to change the score it's the right time to stop losing the points.

Super racing
Super racing
0
Joined: 07 Sep 2009, 20:34

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Scotracer wrote:
Super racing wrote:DDD is a much bigger problem than KERS
The DDD made no difference. All the teams confirmed it.
nope, just the ones who were defending the DDD in front of the FIA

adam2007
adam2007
0
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 14:34

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Super racing wrote:
Scotracer wrote:
Super racing wrote:DDD is a much bigger problem than KERS
The DDD made no difference. All the teams confirmed it.
nope, just the ones who were defending the DDD in front of the FIA
wind your neck in your new to the forum u dnt know anything about formula one

User avatar
ds.raikkonen
8
Joined: 04 Apr 2007, 08:11

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

Paul wrote:If you're happy with lucky 3rd- good for you. I was afraid Lewis would back off, but he didn't & I'm proud of that.
=D> =D> =D>
“Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary...that’s what gets you.” - JC

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

I guess everybody knows this already...The faster the cars, the smaller the time frame you have for passing. All because the tracks obviously stay the same size (they don't grow with the speed of the cars).. IMO, Bigger, broader, high speed tracks need to be selected/created to improve passing.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Ogami musashi
Ogami musashi
32
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:57

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

n smikle wrote:I guess everybody knows this already...The faster the cars, the smaller the time frame you have for passing. All because the tracks obviously stay the same size (they don't grow with the speed of the cars).. IMO, Bigger, broader, high speed tracks need to be selected/created to improve passing.
Speed goes in two ways: You have less time to react BUT when you make a mistake (in the broad sense which includes taking too much time to react) the error has more time/distance impact.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

n smikle wrote:Yeah unlucky on the last lap with the spin out (whatever caused it. not driver error though) but that's what happens when you are that good; the only thing that can stop you is your machine or Nature itself! 8)
Your hero got on the KERS too fast into Lesmos and spun himself into the wall. That is the very definition of a driver error, fanboy.

I mention that because these remarks were the most exiting part of the race. Dull, dull, dull.

But I'm still scratching my head as to why Hamilton, Sutil and Raikkonen didn't go with more aggressive strategies like the cars behind them on the grid. Oh, well. Such is life.

User avatar
ringo
227
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Italian GP 2009 - Monza

Post

noname wrote:
Super racing wrote:Not much of a chance, but a slight one, losing 3rd place for a driver out of WDC contention is not that big a deal.
for the driver maybe not but his team is fighting for 3rd place in constructors championships with its arch rival in red cars.

in the last 4 races Kimi alone got 30 points vs. 31 grabbed by silver duo. there are only 4 races left, if guys from Woking are going to change the score it's the right time to stop losing the points.
Yes i agree, i am a LH fan and was disappointed in the early pit stop and his last lap, but it was a good show he put on, if he wasn't there the race would be quite boring with sutil trailing behind kimi to the finish.
It was a ballsy drive, he was on the knife edge, he slipped and cut his balls on the knife edge so to speak. :lol: It happens.
Mclaren do need the points, i think they can get them in the last set of races if Heiki runs a better race and lewis brings his Hungary mind set into the mix.
All his ballsy races aren't in vain though, its good data to carry over to the next car. Hamilton is the only driver on the track right now this oozes that level of skill and determination almost senna esque, and it should bode well for MP4 25.
For Sure!!