Tomba wrote:Well it's all about the tyres really. Canada became an interesting race because the tyres made such a huge difference.
gibells wrote:Tomba wrote:Well it's all about the tyres really. Canada became an interesting race because the tyres made such a huge difference.
IIRC wasn't Canada the first race Bridgestone said they could bring the softer tyres as requested by the teams/FOM (not sure)? Reason being they had manufactured all the tyres up to Canada.
If correct it will hopefully be the beginning of more crazy tyre strategies.
Blackout wrote:[-X
In Istanbul and Montreal it wasn't slower... same thing in Melbourne and Bahrain.
In Barcelona, Kubica was as fast as Schumacher despite Sutil being in front of him and a broken front wing...) In Montreal, after 3 stops and 2 very damaged endplates, Kubica ended at 1 second behind rosberg (who stopped only 2 times)
The only gp where the Wo1 was really faster than the R30, is Shanghai.
Only the better qulifiying speed and the luck helped Mercedes to keep Renault 'behind'.
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Blackout wrote:[-X
In Istanbul and Montreal it wasn't slower... same thing in Melbourne and Bahrain.
In Barcelona, Kubica was as fast as Schumacher despite Sutil being in front of him and a broken front wing...) In Montreal, after 3 stops and 2 very damaged endplates, Kubica ended at 1 second behind rosberg (who stopped only 2 times)
The only gp where the Wo1 was really faster than the R30, is Shanghai.
Only the better qulifiying speed and the luck helped Mercedes to keep Renault 'behind'.
Seriously, you need to really look at things in a more balanced fashion than to say Mercedes outpacing Renault is all down to "luck".
I had to laugh at it
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Thats right Blame Petrov.
Whining of Mercedes???? Oohhhhhh You mean on Mercedes threads where you post about Renault?![]()
Renault are behind Mercedes get over it.
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], richard_leeds, spadeflush and 4 guests