RicME85 wrote:Interesting new nose![]()
I think Dom means the front wing endplates, they look very ... different
Thee nose is a couple of races old, but thanks for the amazing feedback guys
RicME85 wrote:Interesting new nose![]()
I think Dom means the front wing endplates, they look very ... different
MIKEY_! wrote:looks like one small (half height) slot taking air under the wing, then a full height one like most outwash wings. nothing revolutionary, just a different take on the same old design me thinks. wouldn't be my choice for better performance however, the slots look too large particularly the rear one, interesting all the same.
MIKEY_! wrote:why did you move away from the endplateless design?
N12ck wrote:Sometimes it can be good to back to basics with the design, sometimes designs get that complex you loose track of what is improving what, and you may get more downforce just out of a simple endplated wing design, especially considering we do not have the resources teams have
CottrellGP wrote:N12ck wrote:run CFD on it compared to the old wing using solidworks or something,
Good thinking, i used the autocad falcon one and there airflow looks better on this.
N12ck wrote:CottrellGP wrote:N12ck wrote:run CFD on it compared to the old wing using solidworks or something,
Good thinking, i used the autocad falcon one and there airflow looks better on this.
I have been trying to check how good Autodesk Falcon is in comparison to Openfoam, and its figures aren't massively far away from proper CFD figures, although they dont produce Df figures, which is where Openfoam is king



wesley123 wrote:No way that floor is legal iic bodywork can be seen through the hole
Return to Engineering projects
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Twitter [Bot] and 2 guests