Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Locked
User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

For this size Windmill Red Baron, surely the need for such an actuator driving a generator .. You know that place slot, achieved speed by air is three times greater than the wind blowing from the face of this wing?

Image

Image


Image



Image


Andrew :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Do it now truest innovation .. every airman will save $ 500
In what way? do not have to buy these two venturi tubes to drive clocks ..
Just as in the right wing mount piping spot by not ordinary round a tube and connect the plastic with clocks ... cost of $ 5 ..

After all, on top of an airplane wing vacuum is too ..:D

Image




Andrew

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Christmas gifts:
here my scan such a disease illustrate how will they move the pistons in my engine in 1981, there was no possibilities of making animation and we had to somehow manage .. and the adoption of a decision which is to be the angle of the upper shaft between the pistons was not easy .. But it turned out, however, the simplest of which is 90 degrees should fulfill its task and so happened .. Exactly the drawing start is: 0 degrees angle of the suction piston, the piston 90 degrees exhaust (the figure is badly) and the main piston 80 degrees ..

Image

Here how the work ..

Image

Marry Christmas

Andrew :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Here, a model project of The Spoon Red Baron Tractor. Human powered Dedalus, a comprehensive Weight about 100 Kg. It has been proved that, at a power of 0.3 Kw can take place before long flights .. Here my project model can be 100 times lighter, or to his same drive just 300 watts / 100 = 3 watts .. I think that such a model will be able to produce up more, so I called him a Tractor, he can still pull a glider behind him ..

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPZWUQlhvDA

Andrew :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

With time on holidays, this Yoda even sent a picture from NASA Simulator, explaining many things ...
Oh yes you can see that the lift force (lift) is three times greater than the resistance (drag) the wings .... The diagram shows that the velocity profile at 25% is almost 3 times higher on average .. The purple line on the graph .. The green line is the wind speed .. Yellow is the speed of the lower side profile .. Wind speed is 15 km / h ... At the start of a profile is almost 50 km / h ... Such profiles should have the Red Baron Windmill (spoon too) ..

Image

Image

If the speed is increased by three times, then by using dual such a system, we can get about 9 times Increased speeds the wind that blows on the system .. it is worthwhile to do so .. Well of course, because in the formula for Velocity windmill power plays up to the third power, it is possible to obtain power .. no examples listed here .. for 5 m / s .. Windmill with a diameter of 100 meters are 2,000 KW us .. Now if we take a larger representation rate 9 times that or 45 m / s, it is already at 10 meters in diameter windmill get 2,300 KW. ie the same windmill is ten times smaller .. the rest of the structure is virtually immobile and will not be higher than 50 meters .. as follows from theoretical calculations.'s say the length of the building is 100 m, which can fit 10 windmills in it .. theoretically get 23 MW at a wind speed of 5 m / s.
But of course we can use the Windmill Red Baron ..

Image


Andrew :D :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

If you do not believe my calculations, it can send a check to the CERN ..:rolleyes:

Image

Happy New Year Andrew :D

User avatar
Tim.Wright
330
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 06:29

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Fluids is not my strong point, but I suspect that the above equations are for a freestream condition at a nominal air pressure. What happens when you increase the air speed with the aerofoils is that the pressure drops. The total power (pressure x flow_rate) stays the same.

It appears this is not accounted for in your equations. Or is it included in the coefficient?

In effect its acting like an aerdynamic gearbox, possibly putting the airflow at a better operating point (pressure and flow_rate) for the turbine to give max power or max efficiency.

You could argue that a more conventional (reverse) diffusor would do the same thing.
Not the engineer at Force India

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Tim.Wright wrote:Fluids is not my strong point, but I suspect that the above equations are for a freestream condition at a nominal air pressure. What happens when you increase the air speed with the aerofoils is that the pressure drops. The total power (pressure x flow_rate) stays the same.

It appears this is not accounted for in your equations. Or is it included in the coefficient?

In effect its acting like an aerdynamic gearbox, possibly putting the airflow at a better operating point (pressure and flow_rate) for the turbine to give max power or max efficiency.

You could argue that a more conventional (reverse) diffusor would do the same thing.

Well, this is the rather delicate matter .. Upload wearing the NASA simulator , and you'll see that the reduction in pressure is relatively small, and can increase speed of three times. the graph can be seen also from the lift ( Lift ) has the value three times greater than the resistance. (Drag ) . You can ask a question where you're cur is three times greater lift force , in relation to the resistance. Lift is 212 N and 77 N Drag . So where you're taking this growth ? Therefore, it is greater because MASS air, which is above the wing is relatively large , because its size is related to the length of the profile, which must have adequate long dimension. And then the whole mass is involved in LIFT . It is about increasing our speed because at high speed , our windmill has a high efficiency , and we get to tzreciej might of the increase in power on the shaft of the windmill ... drop in pressure at the top of the profile is a minimum order of a few percent, and increase the speed up to 5 times the beginning of the profile. .. Well, it has nothing to do with the diffuser .. We are concerned about the speed .. Then more energy ( air ) is moving through the windmill .. Three times more .. and it can efficiently collect .. And no thermodynamics is not mentioned here .. For where some thermo ..??

Andrew :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

I think the fundamental thing is that you understand what causes the air at the beginning of the profile is 50 km / h, and not, as the incoming 10 km / h .. Sure pressure at this point, is not it is five times smaller .. Pressure drops us a little, and the speed increases very much .. Ask yourself this question, and the rest will be a piece of cake ..

Andrew :D

User avatar
Tim.Wright
330
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 06:29

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Feliks wrote: Well, this is the rather delicate matter .. Upload wearing the NASA simulator , and you'll see that the reduction in pressure is relatively small, and can increase speed of three times. the graph can be seen also from the lift ( Lift ) has the value three times greater than the resistance. (Drag ) . You can ask a question where you're cur is three times greater lift force , in relation to the resistance. Lift is 212 N and 77 N Drag . So where you're taking this growth ? Therefore, it is greater because MASS air, which is above the wing is relatively large , because its size is related to the length of the profile, which must have adequate long dimension. And then the whole mass is involved in LIFT . It is about increasing our speed because at high speed , our windmill has a high efficiency , and we get to tzreciej might of the increase in power on the shaft of the windmill ... drop in pressure at the top of the profile is a minimum order of a few percent, and increase the speed up to 5 times the beginning of the profile. .. Well, it has nothing to do with the diffuser .. We are concerned about the speed .. Then more energy ( air ) is moving through the windmill .. Three times more .. and it can efficiently collect .. And no thermodynamics is not mentioned here .. For where some thermo ..??
I didn't understand any of that...
Feliks wrote:I think the fundamental thing is that you understand what causes the air at the beginning of the profile is 50 km / h, and not, as the incoming 10 km / h .. Sure pressure at this point, is not it is five times smaller .. Pressure drops us a little, and the speed increases very much .. Ask yourself this question, and the rest will be a piece of cake ..
If the windmill works better at high speed then ok, it somewhat makes sense. However, a bit of reading about Betz' Law suggests that you should be slowing the air speed down in order to maximise energy recovered.

Also, why are you using 2 aerofoil sections instead of the venturis like you showed in the plane?
Not the engineer at Force India

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Air wing profile jws t much simpler to build and everyone more or less knows how to work .. The circular venturi nozzle and its principle of operation hardly anyone .. eg not be argued that only the machines lighter than entrusting can fly .. I just look up ..
And you Betrz with his act is an ordinary crook tensioning the laws of physics .. Basic yo mv ^ 2/2 .. But Mr. Betz ignores the mass in their designs and receive energies .. with what? Besides infinitely thin slice section is infinitely thin mass .. infinitely thin section has a mass = 0, so with you without the weight, has some energy .. ?

By, BY, Mr Betz ... :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

So embarrassing new year to start something pleasant .. Here, the recording band Blue Black and Ada and Wojtek cover what is served up at concerts in the Soviet Union in 1973, passing from the scene, the better, "my Friend" than the "cold war" .. ..
And I think I succeeded ..

Ada unfortunately died 1 January 1991.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=famP4wb5vac


Here, too, if someone did not know that Beatles song and accompaniment of the Kings ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wG6Cgmgn5U

Andrew :D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

So on your way I think, why this project Manchattan taken a Pole, who only since the outbreak of war in 1939 was in England .. After all, his English was not too good for sure .. British citizenship also quickly got something to this project could attend ... ... But I know war, accelerates various activities ... But the English did not really even war .. Therefore I am full of admiration .. as a sincere desire ..
Here in the video you can see, the then fairly good the English had ..
Each fought as best he could to make this world a better place .. Sometimes it was not easy ..

http://www.nfb.ca/film/strangest_dream

:D

User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post


User avatar
Feliks
6
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 10:10
Location: Krakow,Poland
Contact:

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post

Well, here , a movie that shows that " spoon effect" is possible to obtain a large area, no such model of the wing , set " bellies " to each other. Between the wings , air is blown using an ordinary hair dryer .. The second part of the film , you will see that blowing this way only one wing , we can feel the hand , there is some lift of the wing . Simply it is so microscopic that it can not feel , despite the fact that once we're blowing on the wing , then do not . I do not feel any difference. The reason is also that the air dryer has a very low speed, and it is relatively very little ..
However, as we hold as two wings . set ' bellies to each other, and kept at one end , the other end , a very intense vibration , bouncing off each other, as a result of blowing the hair . the film do not really see these vibrations because their speed is high , as the camera does not records so quickly. records and revealed that the image of " waving wings. " In a time while also heard the " clack " of themselves striking the wings .. so attractive force them to each other must be large, as seems the powerful sound of beats between them. wing to descend , and then diverge , and again, there are withdrawal force with each wing , and so the circle. But fairly quickly , despite the relatively large area of ??the wings in relation to a small air stream flowing between them ..
In any case , it is this force several times to each side of the Astringent greater than the lift of a single wing , which you can not even feel that there is in these conditions ..

http://youtu.be/KpIWhqW7lWA

Andrew :D :D

Locked