But trying to compare those NASCAR trucks to F1 is frankly ridiculous. I've watched some of the oval NASCAR stuff and it's about the best cure for insomnia that I can think of.
But "to each, their own" I guess...
Jersey Tom wrote:strad wrote:3400Lbs...110inch wheelbase...12 inch tire width
Try it...it aint easy.
Tires are 12" bulged out at the sidewall, tread is less than 11". And with driver and fuel the cars are 3650 lbs. So even worse than you think
By comparison, GT classes in Le Mans are 2500-2800 lbs? Think even V8 supercars are "only" around 3000 lbs.
Tommy Cookers wrote:does NASCAR still allow drivers to compete with one whole arm in a cast, like (Bobby?) LaBonte in 98 (or99) ?
does F1 allow this ?
It's so rude! Some of the drivers were using an extra 200 ft of runoff as "track"
Nickel wrote:I don't know about this... It's definitely exciting but... It's so rude! Some of the drivers were using an extra 200 ft of runoff as "track" more than once a lap!
Nickel wrote:I don't know about this... It's definitely exciting but... It's so rude! Some of the drivers were using an extra 200 ft of runoff as "track" more than once a lap! I also don't think I'm a fan of the whole bumping thing, I mean it seems like even the announcers were expecting the attacking driver to push the defending one off the track... What the f%?k is that? While I respect the challenge of driving 3400lb bumper cars around a track, it does not embody what I look for from motorsport. I kept expecting one of the cars to have a bloody confederate flag on the top and hit a jump to gap a couple corners. Exciting, yes. Definitely not making me want to watch Nascar any more than before though.
All that being said, F1 could learn something about backing off the reprimands and sanctions. Save them for when Pastor deliberately plows into someone and let them race.
strad wrote:And if you hold me up on the last lap.. I may move you out of the way.
Users browsing this forum: Sogou [Spider] and 2 guests