Which year had most downforce?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
0

Post Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:40 pm

740-760hp is number i´ve been hearing and reading about.
Engines in 2004 was probably around 940-950bhp+. Especially at Monza.
The truth will come out...
HampusA
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2011

0

Post Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:31 pm

Taking into account the power:weight ratio, that is a huge difference
ajdavison2
4
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2010

0

Post Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:07 am

if KERS (80hp) for only 6 seconds duration is worth 0.5 seconds a lap you can imagine 200hp more!
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

0

Post Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:49 am

I think Barcelona is one of the most aero dependant tracks.

I listed the average lap time of the years 04,08 and 10.

2004 Michael Schumacher 1:19.6
2008 Kimi Räikkönen 1:29.4
2010 Mark Webber 1:27.1

The fastet average was set in 2006:
Fernando Alonso 1:18.5
matt21
12
User avatar
 
Joined: 15 Mar 2010

0

Post Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:29 am

n smikle wrote:if KERS (80hp) for only 6 seconds duration is worth 0.5 seconds a lap you can imagine 200hp more!

yeah that's why they could carry more wing. When the v8's came in the development was to reduce drag to increase efficiency as much as trying to find downforce.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher
Pierce89
16
User avatar
 
Joined: 21 Oct 2009

0

Post Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:25 am

matt21 wrote:I think Barcelona is one of the most aero dependant tracks.

I listed the average lap time of the years 04,08 and 10.

2004 Michael Schumacher 1:19.6
2008 Kimi Räikkönen 1:29.4
2010 Mark Webber 1:27.1

The fastet average was set in 2006:
Fernando Alonso 1:18.5


The chicane offsets your numbers, the track can't really help anymore.
Byronrhys
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 9 Aug 2010

0

Post Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:57 pm

Hungary might be a better option,
The truth will come out...
HampusA
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2011

0

Post Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:09 pm

I would love to see a graph showing lateral grip levels from say 1980 to now. The graph would presumably be heavily biased towards downforce but it would be awesome to see exactly what was lost/gained due to changes we know happened.

I.e. Banning of the skirts in early 80's. Banning the wide "white label" Goodyear tires in 1993. Then the massive massive change to the cars in 1994-1995 where they added the stepped bottom (which they still use now) that was said to eliminate 30% of lateral grip (due to downforce), the halfscale wings (in height) that started in 1995. Only in 2009 did the wings get back to ~1m in height but this time they were about half as narrow as back in the day. Then the grooved tires of 1998, also killed grip massively.

Then I'd say the removal of the winglets in 2009 and the engine formula.

It would be awesome to see a graph of lateral grip (possibly speed) around an unchanged, unaccelerating, corner throughout all the years (it would have to be a corner from either:

Montreal, Silverstone, (Monaco), Hungaroring, Spa, Monza, Suzuka or Interlagos.

THose are the oldest circuits still in use, there must be a corner that has remained (the least) unchanged throughout the decades in one of them.
We pity new F1 fans coming into the sport in 2012. They are forced to like F1 with these grotesque nose designs.
gold333
5
 
Joined: 16 May 2011

0

Post Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:24 pm

Im doubtful that 04 had more downforce. Looking at the onboards, they seem less grippy, the drivers are constantly correcting them mid corner, something that seems to happen quite a bit less today.
Lycoming
33
User avatar
 
Joined: 25 Aug 2011

Post Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:42 am

Well they did have plenty more power, even if slightly more downforce than now. And along with that they had grooved tires with similar dimensions, thus a smaller contact patch in general.
Forum guide: read before posting

Join the chatroom during GP weekends!

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen
mx_tifoso
Moderator
User avatar
 
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Location: North America

0

Post Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:30 am

xpensive wrote:That is also true, with the barn-door wings they ran, but the stories of drivers blacking-out with the venturi-cars?

Oh, when I look at the photo of Alan jones in 1980 I just can't believe it :twisted:
timbo
9
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Previous

Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 5 guests