Toe out for turn in

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
0

Post Wed Sep 07, 2011 8:50 pm

Within a system, sure.. if you control force then slip angle is an output which will be contingent on the full set of tire states which include load.

However, the point still is that the definition "is what it is" and slip angle and load are two independent quantities used to define a state.

In any event, I thought we had pretty clearly answered the question some time ago. I'll be honest, I haven't followed what's really been said over the past several posts.

And yes, strad. Difference between orientation (how you point an object) vs the direction of travel (where it goes). However, sideslip doesn't have a preference for what medium you're working through.. be it driving across the ground or flying through the air.
Grip is a four letter word.

2 is the new #1.
Jersey Tom
127
 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: Huntersville, NC

0

Post Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:52 pm

Jersey Tom wrote:Within a system, sure.. if you control force then slip angle is an output which will be contingent on the full set of tire states which include load.


My point is all systems control force, whether a tire tester or a full vehicle.

However, the point still is that the definition "is what it is" and slip angle and load are two independent quantities used to define a state.


I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm pointing out to the general audience that it may be advantageous to look at tires with a different perspective than what you'll find in RCVD or Pacejka. An engineer must understand the tire model before they can do that.
GSpeedR
24
 
Joined: 14 Jul 2011

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:29 am

How about the F1 TOE.
*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´ (¸.·` * EAK
EAKMotorsports
0
 
Joined: 31 Jan 2007

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:51 am

EAKMotorsports wrote:How about the F1 TOE.


Yes.
Grip is a four letter word.

2 is the new #1.
Jersey Tom
127
 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: Huntersville, NC

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:47 am

They uses negative or positive on the front and the rear ?
*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´ (¸.·` * EAK
EAKMotorsports
0
 
Joined: 31 Jan 2007

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:29 am

EAKMotorsports wrote:They uses negative or positive on the front and the rear ?

Negative. A bit more negative in the front; a bit less in the rear.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
106
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:10 pm

I'm wondering what the definition of "slip angle" might be. Often the state of a tire running at a slip angle is distinguished from one sliding or washing.
The former involves the elastomeric deformation of the tire but little actual relative movement between the tire and the track at the contact patch. The latter involves the loss of static friction and transition to lower grip sliding friction. I can't defend this definition, but others seem to subscibe to it.

Or is "slip angle" just difference between the direction the wheel points and the direction it travels?
olefud
59
 
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Location: Boulder, Colorado USA

0

Post Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:24 pm

olefud wrote:Or is "slip angle" just difference between the direction the wheel points and the direction it travels?


That is literally all it is. Nothing to do with linear range versus sliding, tire deflection, or anything. Purely a comparison of rim orientation to direction of travel.
Grip is a four letter word.

2 is the new #1.
Jersey Tom
127
 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: Huntersville, NC

Previous

Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sogou [Spider] and 9 guests