The same rule as is in place in 2012 occurs.
However, the front bulkhead has a max height limit of 525mm above the reference plane.
N12ck wrote:Tozza Mazza wrote:The same rule as is in place in 2012 occurs.
However, the front bulkhead has a max height limit of 525mm above the reference plane.
so no rule on nose tip then? In that case, my nose meets regs,![]()
bucker wrote:N12ck wrote:Tozza Mazza wrote:The same rule as is in place in 2012 occurs.
However, the front bulkhead has a max height limit of 525mm above the reference plane.
so no rule on nose tip then? In that case, my nose meets regs,![]()
http://scarbsf1.com/blog1/2012/10/01/20 ... n-changes/
"As part of the safety programme the FIA will introduce much lower noses. The nose tip must be centered around 185mm and the front bulkhead lowered to 500mm."
FoxHound wrote:.. cars of the last 25 years that have gone on to win, have been the best aerodynamically.
FoxHound wrote:I believe the idea is to move away from aero dependance.
Generally speaking, cars of the last 25 years that have gone on to win, have been the best aerodynamically.
This rule set is a small attempt at redressing the balance.
WhiteBlue wrote:What about the tyre wars of 2001-2006. I remember that Montezemolo said it was a tyre championship and not about the cars at all. So it can't have been all about aero. And engine power was also something that mattered before the freeze.
Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres
Users browsing this forum: Cam, CCBot [Bot], Sogou [Spider] and 11 guests