Why dont we see vortices coming off the front wing?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.

Post Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:37 pm

shelly wrote:Some weeks ago a pcture of a catherham in winter testing was published in this forum, showing condensation streaks of vortices coming from the front


Image
Crucial_Xtreme
 
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Location: Charlotte

Post Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:48 pm

Thanks Crucial! That was what I was talking about
shelly
 
Joined: 5 May 2009

Post Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:23 pm

Try watching the 2003 Japanese GP....if you look at the 17D's on the straight there are visible front wing vortices, just in front of the bargeboards....not on the sides unlike those on the rearwing.
megasyxx
 
Joined: 24 Oct 2010

Post Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:39 pm

1) We do not know the longitudinal placement of the forward vortex, but it certainly is not from the FW endplate. I would say it is generated from the sidepod barge board.

Instructive points:

2) The endplates seem to manage flow without generating a vortex. Maybe the vortices stay small and separated around the outside of the wheel.

3) IF the forward vortex comes off the barge board it is certainly doing nothing to seal (create low pressure) for the floor.

Brian
hardingfv32
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

Post Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:18 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:1) We do not know the longitudinal placement of the forward vortex, but it certainly is not from the FW endplate. I would say it is generated from the sidepod barge board.


Correct, i knew it was a Lotus but wrong Lotus.
And i knew it was from the front of the car you could see a vortice.

Fantastic picture. Would have loved to see a more zoomed in high-res shot.
"Il Phenomeno" - The one they fear the most!

"2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth."
Nando
 
Joined: 10 Mar 2012

Post Wed May 02, 2012 10:41 pm

You have to excuse the crude explanation. The front wing vortex gets f#&%ed off into the tires and then you do everything you can to manage the chain reaction disaster all the way back.
gixxer_drew
 
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Post Thu May 03, 2012 5:33 am

haha best explanation in the whole thread!
the four immutable forces:
static balance
dynamic balance
static imbalance
dynamic imbalance
humble sabot
 
Joined: 17 Feb 2007

Post Fri May 11, 2012 4:58 am

This is the reason I love this forum. I'm learning something every time I visit :)

I just wish sky F1 would do a show or a 20 minute segment going this far into detail sometimes.

on BBC f1 practice session last year. Sam michael visited Crofty, and went quite in depth into aero and helped explain wake etc that was an awesome show!!

Thanks everyone
seinfeld
 
Joined: 2 Apr 2010

Post Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:40 am

The vortex is a deliberate means of shifting the cntre of pressure, (vacuum voided region???) backwards.
In aircraft design, the centre of pressure must be one fuselage width behind the centre of gravity for stability.
That would make the rear wing the final place to make this adjustment before it's actual desired location probably half a mtre behind the car.??????

My 2 cents.
elmerfud
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Location: Dandenong

Post Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:46 am

I believe so, which explains the intensive rear wing development; endplate extensions, slits, vertical gurney flaps*, etc...

Image

*Not pictured here, but I think I do recall seeing them on the RW endplate at one point or another.
Forum guide: read before posting

Join the chatroom during GP weekends!

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen
mx_tifoso
 
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Location: North America

Post Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:37 pm

The front wing does generate vortices and they are probably even much bigger than the ones from the rear wing. You guys just focus on the wrong point of the wing by looking at the outer edges. In fact the sharp cutted wing tips on the middle of the wing are deliberately done like that in order to generate a vortex which is guided with the tuning vanes and bargeboards towards the undercut side pots to seal the floor of the car.
Image
This vortex can be seen on the following picture. Be aware that the a actual vortex will be much bigger, we see just the core of it here.
Image
By the way some smaller vortices are deliberately generated in front of the floor to increase downforce by their lower pressure. Actually they are used to fine tune the floor by moving its centre of pressure.
Notice the steps on the splitter or the saw toot styled bargeboards which Ferrari used to run.
mep
 
Joined: 11 Oct 2003
Location: Germany

Post Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:56 pm

Agree with mep. This was discussed some months ago in a thread "front wing-vortex generators". miqi23 gave some useful insight
shelly
 
Joined: 5 May 2009

Post Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:07 pm

elmerfud wrote:The vortex is a deliberate means of shifting the cntre of pressure, (vacuum voided region???) backwards.
In aircraft design, the centre of pressure must be one fuselage width behind the centre of gravity for stability.
That would make the rear wing the final place to make this adjustment before it's actual desired location probably half a mtre behind the car.??????

My 2 cents.



No way... 5% delta from CoG to CoP is typical else you would see huge under/oversteer across speed ranges For land speed stuff sure.
gixxer_drew
 
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Previous

Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests