Sawtooth-spike wrote:The most important thing is...
How will the sponers respond to havin there adverts split in 2 on the back wing?
I don’t see why you are taking this personally. Different people have different viewpoints. Why should I overlook fact that AMD is partner with both FIA and Ferrari? I have my views and reasons to suspect events that occur.
manchild wrote:If you think that I feel comfortable on this forum or that I like most of the posts that you’re wrong. I often get annoyed and frustrated like “Michael Moore on republican convention in Texas” but I’m not telling others to stop writing what they think.
manchild wrote:Since both of us including the others can only speculate what is the truth until it is revealed different views will exist.
Spensifer_Murphy wrote:And just another thought...Turbulant air...bad for wings trying to make downforce...hence the 2003 engine cover designs. So what happens when we mount rear wings Directly behind turbulange generating rear wheels?! Its madness! We'll endup with skitish rear-ends and car spinning everywhere. Unless they add more wing attack angle...guess what...that means more drag...which means more turbulance...which not only is exactly what we are trying to reduce...it also means LESS top speed on the straights...weren't the FIA trying to reduce speeds a while back???
Cyco wrote:...Manchild: Why is it that Ferrari will benifit from AMD's assosiation with the FIA? Surely they arn't the only team to have an assosiation with them.
Because AMD is only technical partner to Ferrari - no other team.
That is one company whose computers are doing CFD of Formula 1 car for both technical partners (FIA&Ferrari) and I'm sure they don't hide informations from each other.
Users browsing this forum: CAEdevice, CCBot [Bot] and 2 guests