2017 F1 T Wing

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
oetger
14
Joined: 24 Dec 2013, 10:17
Location: NL

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

Image

Sevach
Sevach
1046
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post


User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

Sevach
Sevach
1046
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

This is the second time Mercedes looses their T Wing in practice, i don't know how they haven't been asked to reinforce the thing... FIA was quick to do it against Haas.

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

the fins are fine (and tested ones even better), but those T-Wings can f*ck off.
analogue terrestrial TV is dead anyway.
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Mercedes T Wing

Post

godlameroso wrote:
27 Feb 2017, 00:31
I personally think it's a waste of time. There's areas that are much juicier low hanging fruit than some tiny winglet that probably adds more drag than anything else. Optimizing the rear diffuser, and floor is worth a good second by itself, as there's plenty of front downforce to balance the already plentiful rear downforce. If the T-wing is good for anything it's maybe as a way to keep the rear wing energized when following another car. Sometimes adding bits for the sake of it is counter productive, because you can get lost in trying to balance out too many aero surfaces to work together. When a more "simple" but more well thought out design can be just as good, and probably a better baseline as there's fewer variables to confound you. Which also makes development more structured and easier to validate.
Bottas doesn't seem to lose anything without a T-wing, frankly not only are they a hazard but they're also effectively useless unless their purpose is to make the cars uglier.
Saishū kōnā


User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

Given both Mercs used their T-Wing during FP3 i guess means they are considered "safe" by whatever standards the FIA declared...
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

Sevach
Sevach
1046
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

Phil wrote:
15 Apr 2017, 16:19
Given both Mercs used their T-Wing during FP3 i guess means they are considered "safe" by whatever standards the FIA declared...
Mercedes did strengthen it according to Toto.

Image

DaveW
DaveW
239
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 12:27

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

Toto Wolff: Mercedes F1 T-wing could sustain hit from baseball bat.

Probably the Tacoma Narrows bridge would also survive a hit from a baseball bat!

Dipesh1995
Dipesh1995
104
Joined: 21 Apr 2014, 17:11

Re: 2017 F1 T Wing

Post

Interesting explanation of how the T-Wing works using CFD: https://youtu.be/yJ-xdo8Ebzg