lebesset wrote:is this in fact an evolution ? this could still be the original agreement which ross brawn simplified as 46-54 perhaps?
I think the concept has evolved, lebesset. It doesn't now mention a c.g. position, apparently, only minimum front & rear axle weights. Hence c.g. position will be "fixed" only if a team chooses to run at the minimum overall weight. It's possible, I suppose, that an optimum qualifying set-up might not be at minimum weight with these constraints, particularly if the Pirelli tyres behave very differently from the current Bridgestones.