The FOZ wrote:I don't know, there doesn't seem to be a right answer that satisfies all parties.
If the stunted one wants to run races on TV at European times, a novel idea would be to hold the f**king races in Europe.
Oh... but then $$$$ kicks in.
roost89 wrote:Does anyone know what the white-things coming off the rear wing of the car were when they were coming down the back-straight when the rain started coming down?
nudger wrote:The FOZ wrote:Everyone who thinks otherwise: How exactly should they have proceeded today, keeping in mind that safety is the first concern, and following the rules of racing is not up for debate?
i think the point some people were making was that the timing of the race was asking for trouble.
now, you cant blame the fia for that...i dont think they did anything wrong. The problem was Bernie trying to squeeze every last penny from the event.
Its mush like when they moved the british grand prix to april, and Bernie got all upset because everyone got stuck in the northamptonshire mud ... common sense said it was asking for trouble...just like all the locals had been telling us that the race wouldnt run its course...they were right.

timbo wrote:Giblet wrote:The BRAWN cars don't have KERS, but the in-car there was a definite sharp drop then rise in RPM on the straight.
I noticed that effect with several reportedly non-KERS cars. I believe there's probably new audio/video system implemented this year, and honestly I think it sucks - much part of Saturday footage was made with delayed audio.
myurr wrote:Conceptual you're normally pretty perceptive but are way off base with the Brawn and McLaren speculation.
Bolt the Brawn gearbox and diffuser on to the McLaren car and the McLaren would immediately be slower. A lot slower. There are all the little detail reasons like the suspension mounts being different thus requiring a new suspension design (or getting that off the Brawn as well, in which case it wouldn't necessarily play nice with the McLaren front suspension setup).
But the number one biggest reason is that aerodynamically the diffuser wouldn't get the airflow it requires in order to function correctly. McLaren need to update the majority of the front aero package (a process they have already started) so that more air is channeled under the floor of the car.
So McLaren will have to come up with their own aero solution and Brawn will have to stump up the cash if / when they want KERS.
kilcoo316 wrote:roost89 wrote:Does anyone know what the white-things coming off the rear wing of the car were when they were coming down the back-straight when the rain started coming down?
Water droplets forming in the low pressure centres of the trailing vortex system of the rear wings.
kilcoo316 wrote:The FOZ wrote:People. If you don't have a grasp on the sport, much less reality, please consider investing some time rectifying the matter.
This wasn't a case of a few guys sitting around a table with a bottle of scotch, making --- up as they went along today.
Maybe if you jumped off your soapbox for a minute...
...you'd see people are unhappy at the poison dwarf staging the race at the stupid time of day.The locals say "Don't start it at 5, because the evening rains will affect the race, and will kill the light".
But dickhead Bernie sees $$$$ and ignores them. Cue today's farce.
Charlie Whiting was not to blame, neither were the drivers, the teams, or Bridgestone.
FOM are entirely at fault here.
Rob W wrote:djos wrote:even Marcos Ambrose ....he thinks F1 are doing everything possible to ruin their own sport!
Classy call from Marcos. He's always been a bit of a big mouth but he's pretty much right in this instance.
The FOZ wrote:vyselegend wrote:Near as I can tell, Bernie and Max didn't charter some planes to do cloud seeding. I'm fairly certain the rain was a natural phenomenon.
djos wrote:Rob W wrote:djos wrote:even Marcos Ambrose ....he thinks F1 are doing everything possible to ruin their own sport!
Classy call from Marcos. He's always been a bit of a big mouth but he's pretty much right in this instance.
IIRC he was specifically talking about that retarded points system we almost had this year where most wins = WDC regardless of points.
nudger wrote:djos wrote:Rob W wrote:IIRC he was specifically talking about that retarded points system we almost had this year where most wins = WDC regardless of points.
talking of which...how would that have worked today? maybe just a badge instead of a medal...a championship won with half a race win?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest