Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit  

Register



Author Message
andartop
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:42 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:01 pm
Posts: 510
Location: London, UK
Finally managed to watch the race, thanks BBC for the iplayer!
Well done to Vettel for a strong performance, but still, can't wait for this guy to actually have to overtake someone on track in order to get a win.
Double well done to Webbo for keeping the new champ at bay nice and clean!
Triple well done to Kobayashi, the kid is a natural, here's hoping he'll have a seat in F1 next year now that Toyota are rumored to be pulling out..
Quadruple well done to Brundle for making a complete fool of himself with his comments on Button's amazing overtaking abilities...right before he failed to pass Webbo despite being up to 1 sec/lap faster than him!
Shame on Ferrari for losing that 3rd place in the WCC, should have been able to defend it.
Roll on 2010!

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft
mx_tifosi
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:45 pm 
User avatar
Champion
Champion

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:01 am
Posts: 1600
Location: North America
Having only one useful driver made it quite difficult to defend against two useful drivers from McLaren.

"Big horsepower is relatively easy. Great handling is relatively difficult. That's why big horsepower and great handling together is so mythical it's like the marriage of a unicorn and a centaur – you just don't see it."
- Jonathon Ramsey @ Autoblog

andartop
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:51 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:01 pm
Posts: 510
Location: London, UK
Who was the second useful McLaren driver???
:lol:

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft
mx_tifosi
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:55 pm 
User avatar
Champion
Champion

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:01 am
Posts: 1600
Location: North America
At least Kovalainen scored some points for his team, Fishichella didn't score a single point for Ferrari.

One point from Fisichella would have tied the two teams, and two points would have assured 3rd in the championship.

But both second drivers sucked, no argument about that.

"Big horsepower is relatively easy. Great handling is relatively difficult. That's why big horsepower and great handling together is so mythical it's like the marriage of a unicorn and a centaur – you just don't see it."
- Jonathon Ramsey @ Autoblog

andartop
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:02 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:01 pm
Posts: 510
Location: London, UK
If only Ferrari had hired Kobayashi to replace Massa!!! :roll:

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft
timbo
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:10 pm 
Professional
Professional

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:14 am
Posts: 1449
andartop wrote:If only Ferrari had hired Kobayashi to replace Massa!!! :roll:

Although I'm very impressed with Kamui, I wonder how much of it is down to Toyota handling? It is clear that Toyota has a lot of downforce clearly much better than Renault, so maybe it is easier to adapt to it.

Ray
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:21 am 
User avatar
Professional
Professional

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:33 am
Posts: 1094
Location: Beaufort, SC
Don't forget Ferrari stopped development on the car a few races ago as well. That and going back to what I said about Lewis throwing away good points in Monza. Had he finished there McLaren wouldn't have had to count on Heikki.

WhiteBlue
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:40 am 
User avatar
Master
Master

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:58 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: WhiteBlue Country
andartop wrote:If only Ferrari had hired Kobayashi to replace Massa!!! :roll:


I believe that the Glock vertebra story was fabricated to give Kobayashi a platform to show his wares. He did it very nicely and it may be enough to find him alternative employment while Japan Inc. walks away from F1. There are new teams who would hire a future star.

Q: Are you worried you might be a target to kidnapping in Brazil? Ecclestone: "No, because everyone knows nobody would want me back."
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

ISLAMATRON
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:09 am 
Master
Master

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:29 pm
Posts: 2629
mx_tifosi wrote:At least Kovalainen scored some points for his team, Fishichella didn't score a single point for Ferrari.

One point from Fisichella would have tied the two teams, and two points would have assured 3rd in the championship.

But both second drivers sucked, no argument about that.


2points from Kimi would have done the same, but both ferraris sucked so no go,

Fisi wasnt so bad in the FIF1, Heikki has his days, both deserve to be on the grid next year, although on lower teams.

Heikki may have recently taken over Webber's title as unluckiest driver.

andartop
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:50 am 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:01 pm
Posts: 510
Location: London, UK
timbo wrote:Although I'm very impressed with Kamui, I wonder how much of it is down to Toyota handling? It is clear that Toyota has a lot of downforce clearly much better than Renault, so maybe it is easier to adapt to it.


Well, that's a good point.

Ray wrote:Don't forget Ferrari stopped development on the car a few races ago as well..


And this one as well.

However, had the Old Man still been around these would only be poor excuses that no one would even dare to whisper. Ferrari lost this 3rd place a long time ago, not in Abu Dhabi, by pulling off silly mistakes only equaled in stupidity by the ones they did last year, taking the worst possible strategic decisions, having reliability issues and suffering somewhat "avoidable" crashes. I mean, they haven't been so far down on the WCC since 1993!!! It just didn't seem to me that the 2009 car was the slowest one of the last 16 years..

And having this new guy Kobayashi fighting for points (and getting them!) in his first 2 grand prix, and making it seem so easy (!), only makes you wonder for all that could have been...

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft
mx_tifosi
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:12 am 
User avatar
Champion
Champion

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:01 am
Posts: 1600
Location: North America
ISLAMATRON wrote:Fisi wasnt so bad in the FIF1, Heikki has his days, both deserve to be on the grid next year, although on lower teams.

That's what separates these two from drivers who are capable of or have won championships, these two have some good days but normally are decent or lackluster even in race winning capable cars. IMO.

As for Ferrari, they should have at least developed the car a little bit more. A little development wouldn't significally hurt next years development process. I mean, getting to the last race of the season and all you have is an underdeveloped car that had more potential than was extracted is sad and disapointing. Especially for the team at hand.

"Big horsepower is relatively easy. Great handling is relatively difficult. That's why big horsepower and great handling together is so mythical it's like the marriage of a unicorn and a centaur – you just don't see it."
- Jonathon Ramsey @ Autoblog

freedom_honda
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:47 am 
User avatar
Talent
Talent

Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:12 am
Posts: 344
No offense to Hekki's fans, but I think Hekki is extremely overrated. He had a car that was capable of winning in 2008, yet he only had one race victory and two podiums while he teammate had five victories and five podiums. Let's be honest, Hekki's first victory was very lucky. I am not saying he didn't deserve it, he drove a great race that day, but if Massa hadn't have an engine failure Hekki wouldn't have won it.

He just doesn't have that raw pace that some other drivers (like Alonso, Kimi, Hamilton, Button) have. Neither is he consistent enough unfortunately.

komninosm
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:51 am 
Rookie
Rookie

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 30
BreezyRacer wrote:
n smikle wrote:I feel robbed of the exciting race between Vettel and Lewis; at the second or third Lap I knew something was definitely wrong the car because of the inconsistent lap times. Lewis was driving on three brakes. But yeah.. that how it goes. I am still happy that Kovi kept Kimi at Bay so Mclaren can stay third in the WCC.

I really enjoyed this track..I think it's great. Looks good and drives good.. Even Ross Brawn said the track was "perfect" in what respect I am not sure though, but that means something.


Uh, there was a race .. Lewis lost!

Nice bias there dude...

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Similar topics Forum  Replies   Views   Last post 
No new posts What will F1 be in 2009? General chat

12

7924

by Conceptual View the latest post
on Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:03 pm
No new posts 2009 Regs General chat

2

812

by monkeyboy1976 View the latest post
on Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:25 pm
No new posts 2009 rules 1, 2 General chat

15

1663

by Ciro Pabón View the latest post
on Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:00 am
No new posts New aero rules for 2009 1, 2, 3 Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

43

11196

by blaze6 View the latest post
on Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:22 pm
No new posts No Monte Carlo Rally in 2009! Other racing series

3

897

by Roland Ehnström View the latest post
on Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:04 pm
Jump to:  

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Newsletter Ticker SubscribeFollow us
Contact Advertise Contribute Submit news
Donate
Link us
©1999-2009 F1Technical.net 8.2.1 ⁄ Powered by phpBB forum ⁄ Gallery2 photo gallery ⁄ Policy
Webstats4U - Gratis web site statistieken Eigen homepage website teller