Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit  

Register



Author Message
zgred
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:59 pm 
User avatar
Talent
Talent

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 285
imightbewrong wrote:
zgred wrote:Could somebody enlighten me why Robert Kubica is called Bob?


Bob is short for Robert.


THX. I thought it should be Rob. There is no connection in Polish language between Robert and Bob.

axle
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:10 pm 
Professional
Professional

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 1:45 pm
Posts: 1221
Location: Norfolk, UK
zgred wrote:
imightbewrong wrote:
zgred wrote:Could somebody enlighten me why Robert Kubica is called Bob?


Bob is short for Robert.


THX. I thought it should be Rob. There is no connection in Polish language between Robert and Bob.


There isn't in English either...

It's the same with Richard. You can legitimately call a person called Richard, Dick.

- Axle
CMSMJ1
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:13 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 290
Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom
..or John, Jack

Got to love English..

IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM
pipex
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:28 pm 
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:27 am
Posts: 180
Location: The net
BreezyRacer wrote:Funny you should mention the aero engineer thing pipex. I had heard from an insider that the Honda aero department was full of hacks a couple of years ago.

:lol:
axle wrote:You are aware that NH ran out of fuel thanks to the fuelrig failing in Brazil arn't you? If you are then cool - it was jus the timing of your post seemed to indicate you were blaming the engine for NH's retirement.

axle, i was thinking about Kubica engine overheating problem. Doing nearly the complete race with limited revs, that's all.

"We will have to wait and see".
roost89
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:51 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:34 pm
Posts: 479
Location: Highlands, Scotland
axle wrote:
zgred wrote:
THX. I thought it should be Rob. There is no connection in Polish language between Robert and Bob.


There isn't in English either...

It's the same with Richard. You can legitimately call a person called Richard, Dick.


Robert -> Rob -> Bob

I don't think many Richards like being called Dick nowadays :lol:

"Knowledge may be a powerful engine, but wisdom is its transimission" Stephen Bailey
“Knowledge is knowing the tomato is a fruit, while wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.” Brian O’Driscoll

ISLAMATRON
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:37 am 
Master
Master

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:29 pm
Posts: 2629
I prefer Big nose Bob... and after Nixon all Richards MUST be called Dick.

Engine overheating is more of an aero problem, they probably blocked off some of the air inlet forthe wet qually and couldnt change it for the dry race, plus Bob did a big part of his 2nd stint stuck behind the "1" stoppers and that will definitely make the engine temps rise.

The BMW engines did not have 1 failure last year, and they are essentially the same engines. They may have had a bad batch of parts at 1 point this year.

woohoo
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:08 pm 
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:12 am
Posts: 148
BreezyRacer wrote:Yes, Kubica did quite well with those bulky endplates! It was interesting to hear him talk about how the green track was an advantage for them. He said that they don't seem to go any faster when rubber gets put down, but they are fast on a green track. Interesting ..


Maybe the F1.09 is not lacking in the aerodynamic area, but more in the mechanical ?
It showed good straight line speed in Spa and Monza.
And Kubica had good races in both Australia and Brazil, and at both of these asphalt grip was low.

Or its the way the F1.09 uses its tires ?

The only way to close a stupid question is to give a smart answer
zgred
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:01 pm 
User avatar
Talent
Talent

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 285
Image
Previous new wing

Image
Small change in second deck element.

axle
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:09 am 
Professional
Professional

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 1:45 pm
Posts: 1221
Location: Norfolk, UK
Is is the angle or is the lower deck's wing adjusters (inboard uprights) different too?

- Axle
Diesel
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:08 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:27 pm
Posts: 368
I hope the team lives on, they started to get their act together towards the end of the season and the car really started to look the part.

vasia
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:58 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:22 pm
Posts: 273
Compared to the beginning of the season, the F1.09 in the latest pics looks faster, and what do you know, it IS faster :D.

n smikle
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:24 am 
User avatar
Talent
Talent

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 am
Posts: 657
This was a nice car.. probably the best looking one in my eyes. It finally got up to speed at the end of the season, being on pace with the BGP01. I think the car could have been a race winner if it wasn't for the the slow development.

Pit
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:00 pm 
Junior
Junior

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 5
n smikle wrote:This was a nice car.. probably the best looking one in my eyes. It finally got up to speed at the end of the season, being on pace with the BGP01. I think the car could have been a race winner if it wasn't for the the slow development.


I agree. I've been following the development of F1.09 ever since it was launched and I must admit, that it has become quite a beautiful vehicle. It was hard to believe that there was any hope for this car after its dire performance in Bahrain, but the major upgrades introduced throughtout the season really did their job. Not only did they improve the looks of the F1.09, but more importantly, they turned it into a serious points contender. If the season lasted longer, we would probably see Kubica and Heidfeld on podium a couple of times.

Unfortunately, we must now bid farewell to BMW. Despite originally being Kubica's "fanboy", over the years I've grown to like the whole team. I will miss the flimsy mechanics, Nick's sunglassess and of course dr. Mario (or, to be more precise, his Borat-style moustache). Hope to see them all in Bahrain next year ;)

tomislavp4
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:09 pm 
Talent
Talent

Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:07 pm
Posts: 493
Location: Sweden & Republic of Macedonia
I agree with both of you, the F1.09 became good looking and quite competitive car towards the end of the season, too bad BMW is gone. I don´t blame them though,it was the right thing to do with the current economic situation in mind.

StrFerrari4Ever
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:17 pm 
User avatar
Member
Member

Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 85
Location: London , England
I thought I was the only person who thought as the season progressed the F1.09 was a beauty I mean SPA qualifying when it was flying it just looked absolutely mesmerising.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Similar topics Forum  Replies   Views   Last post 
No new posts HHF to drive for Sauber at Indianapolis? General chat

3

1063

by McLarenfan View the latest post
on Mon Sep 23, 2002 2:59 pm
No new posts What a crazy race - Sauber is fifth in Constructors!! General chat

11

3123

by Monstrobolaxa View the latest post
on Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:21 pm
No new posts Sauber wind tunnel Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

5

1426

by Micky View the latest post
on Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:01 am
No new posts Sauber C23 1, 2 Formula One cars

27

5725

by Guest View the latest post
on Mon May 31, 2004 7:07 am
No new posts Sauber's radiator on F2004 1, 2 Engine, transmission and controls

18

4003

by West View the latest post
on Fri Feb 20, 2004 11:38 pm
Jump to:  

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Newsletter Ticker SubscribeFollow us
Contact Advertise Contribute Submit news
Donate
Link us
©1999-2009 F1Technical.net 8.2.1 ⁄ Powered by phpBB forum ⁄ Gallery2 photo gallery ⁄ Policy
Webstats4U - Gratis web site statistieken Eigen homepage website teller