Canadian GP 2010 - Circuit Gilles Villeneuve

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.

Post Mon May 31, 2010 1:40 am

@ Islamatron, yeah, Carbon Carbon. I am just used to the carbon ceramic being touted all over in the production car world so I tend to type it by accident. Either way, I wonder if and how a Crabon-Carbon brake disk will break if you hit it with a hammer? Vettels brake disk splitting in two really make me wonder if it was overloaded or just merely a low quality unit.
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

Post Mon May 31, 2010 1:57 am

what conditions would hitting it with a hammer simulate?
Vettel's brake disc broke at the ventilation holes correct?
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

Post Mon May 31, 2010 9:11 am

The first real low downforce circuit of the year.

Should be interesting, given just how even the Red Bulls and McLarens were in Turkey, which appears to favour their higher downforce car.

Looking at the speed traps results from Turkey, the McLarens had anywhere from 4 to 8 kph advantage through the trap. Given that end of straight speeds have been up to 10 kph quicker this year, I'd expect the circuit to be even more favourable to McLaren.

I wonder if Red Bull can claw this back in Canada with the adoption of their own F-duct?
Earnard Beccelstone
1
 
Joined: 15 Feb 2010

Post Mon May 31, 2010 9:20 am

First post guvs, so please be nice to me.

I'm pretty sure it would break, it's at very porous(right word?) material, at least the ones on the F430 challenge cars I've worked with.

but feel free to correct me!
esbjornzon
0
 
Joined: 5 Mar 2010
Location: Hofterup, Sweden

Post Mon May 31, 2010 10:30 am

:lol:

What I still remember from the last Canadian GP is the pit lane accident between Kimi and Lewis, along with famous comments from Steve Slater - "Now this is the height of stupidity!"

Boy, what an accident it was!! :twisted: #-o

Later, Rosberg thanked Lewis that he chose Kimi and not him to ram on! :mrgreen:
raceman
-1
User avatar
 
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Location: Pune, India

Post Mon May 31, 2010 11:47 am

"Later, Rosberg thanked Lewis that he chose Kimi and not him to ram on!'
It was kubica standing side to side with kimi, when lewis came and crashed from behind, kubica won the race that day
rsist
0
 
Joined: 7 May 2010

Post Mon May 31, 2010 12:40 pm

funny how nobody ever commented on the fact that kimi didn't stop in line behind kubica , which I would have though was the correct thing to do ; maybe he also was going too fast to stop behind kubica , I don't remember seeing that shot

of course if he had it would have left hamilton somewhere to go

then there would have been nothing to talk about so good job he didn't !

incidentally , why didn't hamilton's crew inform him the light was red , as 2 cars ahead of him had stopped it must have been for a moment or two
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be
lebesset
3
 
Joined: 6 Aug 2008

Post Mon May 31, 2010 1:31 pm

lebesset wrote:funny how nobody ever commented on the fact that kimi didn't stop in line behind kubica , which I would have though was the correct thing to do ; maybe he also was going too fast to stop behind kubica , I don't remember seeing that shot

That's very trolling of you to say so. You could at least make up a rule to support that! :-|
Image
Pandamasque
7
User avatar
 
Joined: 9 Nov 2009
Location: Ukraine

Post Mon May 31, 2010 1:54 pm

esbjornzon wrote:First post guvs, so please be nice to me.

I'm pretty sure it would break, it's at very porous(right word?) material, at least the ones on the F430 challenge cars I've worked with.

but feel free to correct me!



that is not Carbon it is Carone ceramic CCB .
marcush.
102
 
Joined: 9 Mar 2004

Post Mon May 31, 2010 3:14 pm

actually, question here. We know that Monza is an out and out power circuit with the only real aero or downforce corner being the last one (Parabolica, is it?). Spa is a bit of a mixed bag which rewards good downforce and stability through fast corners in the middle sector and a bit of the last sector, and of course through Eau Rouge, with the long straight easy pickings for the powerful V8s of Mercedes, but how much is Gilles Villeneuve a tax on the engines? In reference to these two other power circuits?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
105
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Mon May 31, 2010 3:48 pm

lebesset wrote:funny how nobody ever commented on the fact that kimi didn't stop in line behind kubica , which I would have though was the correct thing to do ; maybe he also was going too fast to stop behind kubica , I don't remember seeing that shot

of course if he had it would have left hamilton somewhere to go

then there would have been nothing to talk about so good job he didn't !

incidentally , why didn't hamilton's crew inform him the light was red , as 2 cars ahead of him had stopped it must have been for a moment or two


Kimi had no obligation to stop in line with BOB, and there was plenty of room for Lewis to go to the left of Kimi, he just wasnt paying attention and broke/turned too late, same for Rosberg who ran into the back of Lewis... it was a really strange incident, but nothing as stupid as what Vettel did yesterday.

@raymondu999 CGV is somewhat an engine track but not as much as Spa or Monza, more about acceleration than top end, hard on the gearbox... but it is horrific on the brakes
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

Post Mon May 31, 2010 3:57 pm

trolling ?

I thought they had to leave the pits in line , not side by side ; how is that trolling?

actually , I just searched out a video and kimi was there because of his pit position

but I didn't realise that hamilton would have been out of the race anyway ...if he had stopped where he should have ,the hit from the rear by rosberg [ I think ] would have been more severe than it was

funny how more than one driver made exactly the same error ; co-incidence ?
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be
lebesset
3
 
Joined: 6 Aug 2008

Post Mon May 31, 2010 5:59 pm

On FI shot, are pads in "bite" position?
Or the clearance between rotor and pads is so small?
Last edited by timbo on Mon May 31, 2010 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
timbo
8
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Mon May 31, 2010 5:59 pm

If I remember right, Hamilton veered off to the left and hit Raikonnen. Any ideas why he didn't just keep the car straight?
andrew
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Post Mon May 31, 2010 6:05 pm

Probly because there was open space to the left of Kimi that he was aiming for but just wasnt able to react in time.
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One races

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: enz0, Redragon and 6 guests