volarchico wrote:MAS has exactly 1/2 the points that HAM currently has. Even with all the "silly mistakes" HAM has made this year, he is still 2x as good as MAS. And yes, some of this has to do with their respective cars but then you compare ALO and MAS and the comparison gains even more credibility.
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Diesel wrote:So your being sexist now?
So your saying you have to treat women like men, or your being sexist?
Im not so sure diesel....Besides thats off topic.
In context of what happened out on track, I see little wrong with Massa interrupting Hamilton. It was uncouth, yes. But its not as if Massa was reacting over a touch of wheels.
vall wrote:volarchico wrote:MAS has exactly 1/2 the points that HAM currently has. Even with all the "silly mistakes" HAM has made this year, he is still 2x as good as MAS. And yes, some of this has to do with their respective cars but then you compare ALO and MAS and the comparison gains even more credibility.
what exactly is your point?
wesley123 wrote:what I think Volarchico was trying to say is that even without the puncture Massa would have finished in the same position, thus he hadnt actually lost anything, so the 'tap' and words are actually pointless.
I actually liked it when I saw it afterwards, adds a bit of much needed rivalry in the paddock, the 'fight' between Massa and Hamilton over the whole weekend makes formula 1 actually interresting, and the tap of Massa was actually the highlight of the weekend. Also really cool to see how Hamilton holds in, his expression really showed him he wanted to hit Massa, but held in. Hamilton (and sure I will be a fanboy here again) really shows to have grown in personality over the pat year. He still shows the same person, but holds in and acts more mature, even when he is furious. From the post race interview it was pretty clear Hasmilton was furious, probably een more at Monazo, yet he holds in.
ringo wrote:
Double standard. If it were the other way round. You'll be the first to say Hamilton physically assaulted Massa.
Massa should apologize publicly.
JMN wrote:On a side note. Considering the 2009 formula to some extend was implemented to improve the racing experience, I'm wondering just how beneficial these wider and lower wings are. I know there was a lot fo discussion about this when the formula was just introduced and to all intends and purposes, the wings does contribute more to overall downforce. However, it seems to be the distance a car is able to follow a car in front has not been significantly reduced. You do however see alot more top and midfield drivers dropping more or less out of the game following front wing damage caused by the close quater racing we love to see and hope to facilitate through the rules.
My question is this. Do you reckon the racing would be better with wings and winglets akin those of 2008?
vall wrote:wesley123 wrote:what I think Volarchico was trying to say is that even without the puncture Massa would have finished in the same position, thus he hadnt actually lost anything, so the 'tap' and words are actually pointless.
I actually liked it when I saw it afterwards, adds a bit of much needed rivalry in the paddock, the 'fight' between Massa and Hamilton over the whole weekend makes formula 1 actually interresting, and the tap of Massa was actually the highlight of the weekend. Also really cool to see how Hamilton holds in, his expression really showed him he wanted to hit Massa, but held in. Hamilton (and sure I will be a fanboy here again) really shows to have grown in personality over the pat year. He still shows the same person, but holds in and acts more mature, even when he is furious. From the post race interview it was pretty clear Hasmilton was furious, probably een more at Monazo, yet he holds in.
I don't think would have finished 9th if it was not for the silly Hamilton mistake.
As for the other point, I totally agree. We need more of this stuff.
komninosm wrote:Mandrake wrote:tbh I was concentrating on polishing my car and didn't take too many looks to the screen, I must've missed the interview or at least the critical parts of it. Maybe I shouldn't take Singapore as an example for his maturity then, but everywhere else he admitted his faults which was refreshing to see.
I feel if Hamilton did the same he would get a totally different perception.
When did Schumacher ever admit his faults? When he parked his car on last turn in Monaco or when he crashed into other cars on purpose? Or ever really?
Besides Hamilton said it was his fault last race when he touched Kobayashi so there goes your theory out the window.
Again, confirmation bias.
raymondu999 wrote:I think it's fair to point out that again, he can't see his front wing, and so he wouldn't know if he was behind/ahead of the SC line that time. But that's a topic for another day.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests