Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Post Reply
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

komninosm wrote:I don't think you got anywhere, he didn't change his position nor you.
We didn't need to – we now understand why each other thinks the collision was $x's fault, and we can discuss any future incidents more sanely now. Just because no one was battered into changing their mind, doesn't mean it wasn't a productive discussion.

Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

Some messages deleted. If you argue about 'fanboyism' your messages will be deleted.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

Gerhard Berger
-1
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:17

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Seems like most people inside the sport of F1 don't agree with the stewards decision.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/formula ... 569488.stm


"You could argue all day about the rights and wrongs of the latest crash involving Lewis Hamilton and Felipe Massa but it was a 50-50 incident in my opinion," he wrote in his latest column on the BBC F1 website.
Most people being Webber and Coulthard?
to be fair, i think it was either Coulthard or Brundle said that they got a plane back containing alot of staff from the teams, and alot of them said they didn't understand why Massa got a penalty.

lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Autosport Magazine wrote:Kerbs at the Buddh International Circuit are to be revised after Ferrari's Felipe Massa suffered two suspension failures during the Indian Grand Prix weekend.
LAAAAME!

laame ?

no , pathetic !

personally I loved those kerbs , didn't cause any problems did they
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

I agree it's lame. But you're not quite accurate there. Felipe's suspension failures both came from the kerbs
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

raymondu999 wrote:I agree it's lame. But you're not quite accurate there. Felipe's suspension failures both came from the kerbs
I agree, but your way of phrasing it is off, instead, "Felipe's suspension failures both came from him driving the car in a way that caused lots of load to go through the suspension". If you crash into a barrier at Monaco, do you say "his suspension collapse came from the armco"?

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

Well yeah, but indirectly it was due to the kerbs too.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

I think we are all agreed that those kerbs added an element of peril to focus the drivers' minds, and Massa failed to maintain enough focus which resulted in damaged suspension.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

richard_leeds wrote:I think we are all agreed that those kerbs added an element of peril to focus the drivers' minds, and Massa failed to maintain enough focus which resulted in damaged suspension.
My fear with them is how long until they send a car airborne

beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

flynfrog wrote:
richard_leeds wrote:I think we are all agreed that those kerbs added an element of peril to focus the drivers' minds, and Massa failed to maintain enough focus which resulted in damaged suspension.
My fear with them is how long until they send a car airborne
Massa hit them about as hard as it's possible to hit them, and no airborneness really happened, You need a shallower aproach to launch a car.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

beelsebob wrote:
flynfrog wrote:
richard_leeds wrote:I think we are all agreed that those kerbs added an element of peril to focus the drivers' minds, and Massa failed to maintain enough focus which resulted in damaged suspension.
My fear with them is how long until they send a car airborne
Massa hit them about as hard as it's possible to hit them, and no airborneness really happened, You need a shallower aproach to launch a car.
I was thinking more of hitting them more head on perpendicular to the track.

beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

flynfrog wrote:I was thinking more of hitting them more head on perpendicular to the track.
I guess I might believe that might launch them, but I'm struggling to imagine a situation with a car carrying significant speed in that direction.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

beelsebob wrote:
flynfrog wrote:I was thinking more of hitting them more head on perpendicular to the track.
I guess I might believe that might launch them, but I'm struggling to imagine a situation with a car carrying significant speed in that direction.
a slight tap in the corner before the car snaps back the other way. Not saying its that common but I think there would be a safer way to accomplish the same thing.

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

Also I hope they dont plan to race bikes on the track those kerbs would be lethal

i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Indian GP 2011 - Buddh

Post

There's plenty of run off in that area so it wouldn't be a massive issue if a car got some air. It's a hell of a lot safer than the curbs in Singapore, that's for sure!

Post Reply