gixxer_drew wrote:Now if the boundary layer buildup exceeds what you calculate it to be (and this happens ALL the time) you kind of scratch your head, but depending on budgets and time you pursue what you must to get a car ready and performing at the best you can with the tools and money you have. Especially when you have a rolling floor, everyone thinks that fixes everything.
Someone I really look up to once told me that you never really understand the car until you designed and tested the wind tunnel as well.
If your CFD and your tunnel data don't converge, what do you trust? A mathematical system designed around giving the same results as a wind tunnel or a wind tunnel?
Nobody else copied it, it only worked in one tunnel. Might explain their car's performance if it were true. DId that feature appear on the new car after they pulled out?
In my vivid imagination F1 tunnels are so amazing they always give perfect values but reality may be a bit different. ;)
I think you paint too negative a picture, especially for those who have no actual tunnel experience. I don't think any of the issues you bring up are unknown to most major tunnel operators. Chances are good that many of the solutions are proprietary, so in fact they are not issues at all. We don't even have a good idea how much is spent doing tunnel development.
In the end I think you develop a numbers that represents the accuracy of the correlation between CFD, WT and actual track results. You view your results through the lens of these numbers.
Brian