I believe that widening of the plume is what RB are trying to avoid with their new tunnel. The tunnel takes the air coming from sidepods, protecting the exhaust on it´s way wherever it´s going.
The C31 has the same exhaust concept as RB8. I think these 2 cars have very much in common(the front intake, exhaust, the hole concept design is similar), but RB8 is more refined and have very nice details.
They would have been better just to have a lower nose. If they are using a 'vacuum cleaner' effect it would give them better flexibility to reduce front DF if their exhausts didn't work as predicted. (although they could just back the FW off instead)Kaivo wrote:vacuum cleaner' effect ?
More downforce in front area
I think that car looks amazing.Blackout wrote:+ the slotted nose vanes
http://f1zoom.co.cc/?year=2012&race=cat ... =50&view=1
Now, why would you have an electrical connection in front of the drivers feet when we no longer have movable front wings?MIKEY_! wrote:
Inside of the nose. From scarbs: "captured by Aero Student Sriram Chandra - Copyright"
1) Copyrightaduka11 wrote:Now why would someone copywright this?MIKEY_! wrote: Inside of the nose. From scarbs: "captured by Aero Student Sriram Chandra - Copyright"
Users browsing this forum: Flying JPS Lotus and 3 guests