Vodafone McLaren MP4-27 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Anything related to a specific race should go in the appropriate race thread.

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:58 pm

godlameroso wrote:If they are making "inverted U pods" it's a brilliant execution of something that I've been considering for the last two years. Audi did this with their R15, and their DTM cars, it's actually odd to see F1 take this long to run with the concept. As usual though it appears RB was 'at that party' already. In fact it's the through body aero that is essentially the last place to get any decent aero gain seeing as the lack of regulations pertaining to most of the sidepod area.


How do you mean 'as usual red bull are already at the party'?

I wouldn't be surprised though, notice how red bull as usuall keep quiet about development, Newey will put something on the car Friday, storm 2 pole by a ridiculous amount and everyone will be saying 'mclaren have a new what?'.....
Is it me? or are a lot of people very anal about things in this forum?
CjC
 
Joined: 3 Jul 2012

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:31 pm

So far the simulations are showing quite turbulent flow through the tunnel, will publish images later :? also something else thats interesting is that the flow goes through the tunnels, follows the cokebottle and then rapidly changes direction towards the outer edges of the diffuer, slightly confusing :?

edit: the flow slows down through the tunnel
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:39 pm

N12ck wrote:So far the simulations are showing quite turbulent flow through the tunnel, will publish images later :? also something else thats interesting is that the flow goes through the tunnels, follows the cokebottle and then rapidly changes direction towards the outer edges of the diffuer, slightly confusing :?

edit: the flow slows down through the tunnel


Are you doing this having an Red Bull duct at the end of the tunnel under or at the exhaust, so the flow goes thru the tunnel then into a duct ?
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:41 pm

no upside down L pod design as scarbs suggested,
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:43 pm

N12ck wrote:no upside down L pod design as scarbs suggested,


Yeah but i think even that has to lead into something, cant just have alot of air going thru the sidepod and just exit, i believe if they do make a tunnel it will lead air from the beginning of the sidepod into a duct or ducts at the end of the sidepod, at the exhaust or under.
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:43 pm

N12ck wrote:edit: the flow slows down through the tunnel


Would this not be the expected result? The sides of the tunnel will create a large surface area which will create a large amount of boundary layer interaction slowing the air down significantly.
Thank you to God for making me an Atheist - Ricky Gervais.
simieski
 
Joined: 29 Jul 2011

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:45 pm

whats interesting is it follows the coke bottle then rapidly changes direction towards the outer edges of the diffuser, exactley where you want the exhaust gases :idea:
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:39 pm

N12ck wrote:whats interesting is it follows the coke bottle then rapidly changes direction towards the outer edges of the diffuser, exactley where you want the exhaust gases :idea:


Under normal circumstances with 2012 exhaust positioning that would push exhaust gases away (probably up) and would be a bad idea. But they can combine it with double floor Red Bull trick, and keep tunneled air under the floor separated from exhaust.

I'm more interested in another option. A variation of regular 2011 U sidepods used to channel air over exhaust position to push exhaust gasses down over diffuser.
simos
 
Joined: 12 May 2012

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:43 pm

Possibly my tunnel isnt long enough, I will try a longer tunnel :D
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:00 pm

N12ck wrote:Possibly my tunnel isnt long enough, I will try a longer tunnel :D



Plz try if you can to add a duct similair to the red bull one that leads the air to the motor starter hole, after the tunnel or inside the tunnel at the end.

Edit: If its hard to understand or visulize what i mean, i think of the U-Tunnel as it not having an open end, that it feeds air into a duct that starts inside the tunnel at the very end of what would be the wall of the cutout under the mclaren exhaust on the current car setup, and that duct would then be above the floor at the end much like RB has and lead to the start motor hole.

Do you understand what i mean by that ?
Huntresa
 
Joined: 3 Dec 2011

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:08 pm

Huntresa wrote:
N12ck wrote:Possibly my tunnel isnt long enough, I will try a longer tunnel :D



Plz try if you can to add a duct similair to the red bull one that leads the air to the motor starter hole, after the tunnel or inside the tunnel at the end.


I will do tomorrow, but at the moment, I am getting my head round the current solution, I am trying to do all this before we see McLaren's new bodywork so we can know its effects without guessing, 'it may do this or that' :lol:
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:55 pm

So the "no sidepods as such" car arrives for the German GP? ..... maybe the change is only so minor that you will barely notice it (like with Mercedes W03)..... :? But according to Andrew Benson of BBC Martin Whitmarsh said they will be "quite different" .....hoolahoop :mrgreen:
"Results never tell the full picture. You need to take a close look at the story behind those results." raymondu999
FrukostScones
 
Joined: 25 May 2010
Location: Bonnie's Ranch

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:58 pm

I've been wondering why teams haven't done something like this before. However, here it seems is the answer:

Any vertical cross section of bodywork normal to the car centre line situated in the volumes defined below must form one tangent continuous curve on its external surface. This tangent continuous curve may not contain any radius less than 75mm:

a) The volume between 50mm forward of the rear wheel centre line and 300mm rearward of the rear face of the cockpit entry template, which is more than 25mm from the car centre line and more than 100mm above the reference plane.
b) The volume between 300mm rearward of the rear face of the cockpit entry template and the rear face of the cockpit entry template, which is more than 125mm from the car centre line and more than 100mm above the reference plane.


Since I think a fully enclosed tunnel's sides count as external surfaces, a tunnel like this is limited to 50mm in height - surely too small to be effective as Red Bull found with their V1 and V2 tunnels.

It could be done, sure, but it would not be effective in my opinion.

The shape will revert to something far more like the Red Bull or Ferrari I think. It is more likely to be the Red Bull because of the Ferrari's odd radiator layout etc. which has all been done with their exhaust in mind.
"A wise man speaks because he has something to say; a fool speaks because he has to say something."
amc
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2012

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:59 pm

Well, it's still guessing, as we don't know what the bodywork is :lol:

It could just be a massive repackaging for small pods for all we know atm :)
PhillipM
 
Joined: 16 May 2011
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Post Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:14 pm

PhillipM wrote:Well, it's still guessing, as we don't know what the bodywork is :lol:

It could just be a massive repackaging for small pods for all we know atm :)


true but we can know the effects of the upside down L pods, so everyone is happy! :D :lol:
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One cars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], ema00, enz0, Exabot [Bot], kwanchepan, Qvart, RicerDude, stevebrennan, Twitter [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 30 guests