If it broke, its clearly not flexible enoughzioture wrote:https://twitter.com/Graftechweb/status/ ... 8555497472
The monkey seat broken, it is too flexible?
Look at the U-shaped support and the strange gray line
flyboy2160 wrote:I don't buy the reasoning about the Pelican bump being intended to influence the FW airflow. If the narrowing is just above the FW, how does increasing the airspeed on top of the wing help FW downforce? It would seem to hurt it.
I'll buy that the bump changes the camber line of the otherwise lifting camber nose cross section into a more neutral camber line that creates less nose lift.
Just shows how journalists do not understand what they are writing about.zioture wrote:https://twitter.com/Graftechweb/status/ ... 8555497472
The monkey seat broken, it is too flexible?
Look at the U-shaped support and the strange gray line
That is the important 'if'.zioture wrote: If the narrowing is just above the FW, how does increasing the airspeed on top of the wing help FW downforce? It would seem to hurt it.
if you look at my drawing in the yellow circle, I have highlighted the u-shaped holder that bent and this has caused after the breaking of the flapJano11 wrote:Just shows how journalists do not understand what they are writing about.zioture wrote:https://twitter.com/Graftechweb/status/ ... 8555497472
The monkey seat broken, it is too flexible?
Look at the U-shaped support and the strange gray line
A too flexible part will not break, it will flex.