1. guess what, you're not the only one here, but you're the only one being offended here. everybody knows about the wall.noel wrote: 1. being jewish, believe me, i know about the wall in question.
2. still think it's very unlucky verbiage, hence
3. me saying borderline.
4. clever use of the head vs. wall emoticon.
was trying to make a joke there, sadly there's no punctuation for sarcasm. apparently we all have things we need to work on.Manoah2u wrote:bashing head against the wall has nothing to do with a wall just the sheer stupidity of turning a simple and well founded comment into something hateful. It's a returning pattern and it's completely unfounded. seriously, get a grip.
mod above summed it up well. i replied because of point 4 which was even less founded than anything. absolutely rediculous ,get a grip.
While that's true it will not make any practical difference as all the cars are going at such a similar speed.Moose wrote:But the period that you're on full throttle will increase the more drag and downforce you have.Cold Fussion wrote:Not in a fuel flow limited formula. It doesn't matter if they have 100,000 N or 10 N of drag, they'll still burn 27.78 g/s of fuel when full throttle.NoDivergence wrote:Horsepower does not negate drag. It means you consume more fuel.
So, he IS a p*ssy!
i hope he's kidding
I've always thought James Vowles is a very poor strategist when it comes to racing with other teams. It's a weakness that's been noticeable in 2013 against Red Bull too.noel wrote:Quick question. What in the world did the team just do? No pay for the strategists this weekend.
He's just not good enough? He's had far less time at the front, even in his rookie years pre-F1 and it might take him a long time before he reaches his optimum performance. Just doesn't have the skill.De Jokke wrote:Strategy was a disgrace, but you can't win 'em all.
Hopefully they'll learn and regroup and win in China!
ps: what's up with Rosberg. He just can't match Lewis despite being on the faster tyre, having had more winter testing and FP's. Any ideas? Could well become a hami vs vettel season...
Rosberg has a couple of races each year where it all comes together, last year was a bit flattering because even when it wasn't optimum he would be second or even win if Hamilton failed to finish. He only had the upper hand a few races last year when you look closely (from memory: Monaco, Austria, Belgium and Brazil). He's a brilliant driver, one of the best but just not the best...J0rd4n wrote:He's just not good enough? He's had far less time at the front, even in his rookie years pre-F1 and it might take him a long time before he reaches his optimum performance. Just doesn't have the skill.De Jokke wrote:Strategy was a disgrace, but you can't win 'em all.
Hopefully they'll learn and regroup and win in China!
ps: what's up with Rosberg. He just can't match Lewis despite being on the faster tyre, having had more winter testing and FP's. Any ideas? Could well become a hami vs vettel season...
Judging by his reaction to Lewis's Australia win, and his radio comments today, I think he is mentally beaten.
Ferrari technical director James Allison is not convinced his team will be able to repeat its Malaysian Grand Prix performance at the next round in China in two weeks' time.
.
.
.
In Melbourne Mercedes were very, very dominant, but even in free air we couldn't have held a candle to them in Melbourne. There's a lot of work for us to do before we can come to a race weekend confident that we can hunt for victory from the first session of the weekend. But we do have an exciting development programme and we've got a lot of performance to bring.