2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Brian Coat wrote:Daimler combustion R&D "...puts any challenger into a big disadvantage or even contending with them impossible. The only company coming close to this might be VW/Audi/Porsche. "

Does anyone share my view that BMW or Ford (cited above) would not have anything much to fear from Stuttgart or Brixworth, with respect to reciprocating engine combustion research capability.
A pure assumption because of the wide array of gasoline and Diesel engines developed by Mercedes for trucks as well. Maybe I should do more research but from the outside it looks like BMW is busy with improvements outside the chamber (Vanos, ED, electric) and Ford with reletive old gasoline engines.

FPV GTHO
8
Joined: 22 Mar 2016, 05:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Ford are hardy going to return without a partner such as Cosworth to do the hard work.

Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I was talking about combustion system capability, not race engine capability.

For race engine capability Daimler needed a partner too & they 'loved it so much they bought the company!'

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

FPV GTHO wrote:Ford are hardy going to return without a partner such as Cosworth to do the hard work.
All the good people from Cosworth have been snatched by the big names, the company just ain't what it used to be, though, they're still Cosworth with a capital C.
Saishū kōnā

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

godlameroso wrote:
FPV GTHO wrote:Ford are hardy going to return without a partner such as Cosworth to do the hard work.
All the good people from Cosworth have been snatched by the big names, the company just ain't what it used to be, though, they're still Cosworth with a capital C.
In hindsight, the jump from frozen V8 engines to hybrid V6T PU's with fuel flow restrictions might have been to big. All the special racing engine engineering companies are more evolutionary.

The better way should have been IMO: V10 -> V6T with air restrictor -V6T air res. with KERS -> current hybrid PU.

Now companies like Cosworth haven't got a chance.

wuzak
443
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Jolle wrote:
godlameroso wrote:Now companies like Cosworth haven't got a chance.
Companies like Cosworth never did unless they had major manufacturer backing.

FPV GTHO
8
Joined: 22 Mar 2016, 05:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

wuzak wrote:
Jolle wrote:
godlameroso wrote:Now companies like Cosworth haven't got a chance.
Companies like Cosworth never did unless they had major manufacturer backing.
Ford and Cosworth were a great pair in that sense.

J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Here: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/0 ... 25_a1b.pdf

..is a an interesting bit of research from nearly 60 years ago into combustion efficiency/power output - utilizing skipped firing..
& although it is done on a 2T test engine, could it be.. that the principles are in application, in F1 currently?
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I couldn't download it for some reason but if it's a 'walking' cylinder cut then my opinion is quite possibly yes at light load because you can hear some such going on from the exhaust noise?


Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Not sure this technology really offered what it promised.

The first guys secured a lot of funding but recently went out if business ...

https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?id ... 6565436561

gruntguru
563
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Brian Coat wrote:Not sure this technology really offered what it promised.

The first guys secured a lot of funding but recently went out if business ...

https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?id ... 6565436561
Are they the guys that wanted to light the fire with sound waves? That would have the potential to ignite the entire charge at detonation-like speeds.
je suis charlie

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Brian Coat wrote:Not sure this technology really offered what it promised.

The first guys secured a lot of funding but recently went out if business ...

https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?id ... 6565436561
Companies go out of business for a lot of reasons. That De Boers guy has a nice CV heading Cosworth engine development for a number of years. For all we know the company sold its technology and closed up shop . Wouldn't be the first time that's happened. Happens all too often in the tech sector, Instagram, snap chat, etc.
Last edited by godlameroso on 26 Jul 2016, 14:56, edited 1 time in total.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

gruntguru wrote:
Brian Coat wrote:Not sure this technology really offered what it promised.

The first guys secured a lot of funding but recently went out if business ...

https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?id ... 6565436561
Are they the guys that wanted to light the fire with sound waves? That would have the potential to ignite the entire charge at detonation-like speeds.
They wanted to create a system to use a heated catalyst element to pre-condition the fuel then use temperature and pressure to take the fuel to a supercritical state and finally inject it in the traditional sense. They had some success with a one cylinder prototype, and demonstrated that the concept worked. All the people involved were very established in their fields and from one day to the other the company closes.
Saishū kōnā

Brian Coat
99
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 18:42

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Well ... They did have some good engineers and I'd be very happy if it was indeed the next big breakthrough.

But I cannot find facts to support the PR the company put out in 2010, suggesting efficiency improvements of 50+%

Their published single cylinder work claimed ITE ca. 45% which would be a BTE of what? 38% (+/-) in a normal 4 cyl road car engine.

That is pretty darn good, but nothing to over-excite the current F1 guys or say a Prius is it, let alone a "+50% improvement."?

Post Reply