This fact worries me for mercedes that the lap is so long and yet the redbull is within a few tenths...f1316 wrote:They've progressed well but we have to remember that Spa was the worst circuit for the Honda PU last year. On such a long lap it really highlighted the deployment issues.GPR-A wrote:What a progress McLaren has made in 12 months !!! Last year, they were 3.781 seconds adrift of the pole time and this year, they are just 1.3 Seconds behind !!!
So a big chunk of that improvement is Honda fixing an inherent deficiency.
Still, the package is coming along well and expect to see them make up a top four next year with a gap to Williams etc.
Redbull is close in pace on the super softs but in Q2 Ric on the soft was 1 second off Nico's pace. Their best chance is Max getting a good start off the line and hold Nico up to mix things up. I also think Nico would of been faster had Hamilton been qualifying in Q3, Nico knows he has to deliver his best to beat Hamilton.PlatinumZealot wrote:This fact worries me for mercedes that the lap is so long and yet the redbull is within a few tenths...f1316 wrote:They've progressed well but we have to remember that Spa was the worst circuit for the Honda PU last year. On such a long lap it really highlighted the deployment issues.GPR-A wrote:What a progress McLaren has made in 12 months !!! Last year, they were 3.781 seconds adrift of the pole time and this year, they are just 1.3 Seconds behind !!!
So a big chunk of that improvement is Honda fixing an inherent deficiency.
Still, the package is coming along well and expect to see them make up a top four next year with a gap to Williams etc.
Nico was trying to play a psychological game at Hockenheim revving his engine at the start line then had a dog of a start going into the first turn in forth position. Hamilton's starts have improved a great deal compared to the start of the season, he tries to hold back if he's starting in second place in the warm up lap trying to leave Rosberg sitting at the start line longer to allow more heat into the clutch of Romberg's.godlameroso wrote:It's not about who's better it's who's ahead after the start. If Nico gets ahead of Hamilton he can control the pace, just like Hamilton controls the pace, because following cars is really hard and destroys your tires. The physical margin for error is so small that the only real difference is a psychological one.
He doesn't have a great track record for you to make that kind of claim.godlameroso wrote:It's not about who's better it's who's ahead after the start. If Nico gets ahead of Hamilton he can control the pace, just like Hamilton controls the pace.
What IMO is surprising considering the token restrictions wich limit development so muchf1316 wrote:They've progressed well but we have to remember that Spa was the worst circuit for the Honda PU last year. On such a long lap it really highlighted the deployment issues.GPR-A wrote:What a progress McLaren has made in 12 months !!! Last year, they were 3.781 seconds adrift of the pole time and this year, they are just 1.3 Seconds behind !!!
So a big chunk of that improvement is Honda fixing an inherent deficiency.
Do you have inside info or just your guess?nevill3 wrote:Matt_b has it correct, they were simply covering the chance that the track got quicker towards the end of the Q2 session and the later runners who could have pushed them out of Q3, with the lap being so long they had to be on track and on a fast lap just in case. I do not see them using the Supersoft Tyre in the race unless either the temperature drops significantly or they get a puncture or a safety car with only a few laps to go and they are marginal on which ever tyres they are on.
In the Sky tv commentary Pirelli were reported to have said that the lap delta between the soft and the supersoft was 1.6 seconds and the last thing Ferrari needed was to be knocked out in Q2 due to gambling on only a couple of tenths between being safe or out. The sensible thing was to be on track just in case, I think it was the smart thing to do in the circumstances. Riciardo survived by the narrowest of margins, Kimi was able to gain a couple of tenths in the last sector by getting the braking for the last chicane perfect and who is to say someone else couldn't do the same.Andres125sx wrote:Do you have inside info or just your guess?nevill3 wrote:Matt_b has it correct, they were simply covering the chance that the track got quicker towards the end of the Q2 session and the later runners who could have pushed them out of Q3, with the lap being so long they had to be on track and on a fast lap just in case. I do not see them using the Supersoft Tyre in the race unless either the temperature drops significantly or they get a puncture or a safety car with only a few laps to go and they are marginal on which ever tyres they are on.
The later runners had to improve 1.5 seconds to push Ferrari out. What you say is correct when difference is half a second, not 1.5 seconds
I completely agree, you could already see against Schumacher that Rosberg lacked in racecraft.Chuckjr wrote:Let's be realists. Nicos best can't beat Hamilton.
I completely agree, you could already see against Schumacher that Rosberg lacked in racecraft.Sonador wrote:Chuckjr wrote:Let's be realists. Nicos best can't beat Hamilton.
Correct me, if I am wrong. I thought that during the warm-up lap, each car needs to be within 2 car lengths from the car in front. It seems that Hamilton is sometimes further behind. This is an inappropriate tactic used by Hamilton, right?ClarkBT11 wrote:
Hamilton's starts have improved a great deal compared to the start of the season, he tries to hold back if he's starting in second place in the warm up lap trying to leave Rosberg sitting at the start line longer to allow more heat into the clutch of Romberg's.