2014 Design

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Turbo
0
User avatar
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:28 am
Location: NJ

2014 Design

Postby Turbo » Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:09 am

Has anyone drawn up a mockup on what the 2014 car will look like?

kosioBG
66
User avatar
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:31 am
Location: Bulgaria

Re: 2014 Design

Postby kosioBG » Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:40 am

yes, that would be interesting

FW17
147
User avatar
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:56 am

Re: 2014 Design

Postby FW17 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:01 am

It would look the same as the cars today with radiator on one side and inter cooler on the other or a smaller radiator and intercooler on either side, or a Merc like double deck radiator.

The gear box will be longer so that turbo can located over it. Over all the plumbing will be the most challenging aspect because of the single turbo.

The F1 turbo will be located in the similar place as the Champcar ones but longitudinally
Image

ninno_
0
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:36 pm

Re: 2014 Design

Postby ninno_ » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:27 pm

any big differences in appearance?

neilbah
16
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:36 pm

Re: 2014 Design

Postby neilbah » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:41 pm

is it possible roll hoop designs will vary?, i dont know how much air is currently rammed..(if at all?) with the current air boxes. but as a turbo sucks in all the air it needs does it become a less critical area of the car? or even unnecessary? or will they stay much the same for internal aero/air for intercooling etc

Sebp
28
User avatar
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Surrounded

Re: 2014 Design

Postby Sebp » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:54 pm

The current engines suck aswell. No pun intended... :-"
Resistance is futile

Just_a_fan
190
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:37 pm

Re: 2014 Design

Postby Just_a_fan » Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:20 pm

I can see the roll hoop intake remaining even if the rules don't require the triangular side profile for advertising (haven't checked the 2014 bodywork rules to see). A periscope intake somewhere else will create drag / turbulence that is less easy to deal with.

N12ck
12
User avatar
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: 2014 Design

Postby N12ck » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:43 pm

I did do a mockup a while ago of the 2014 regs in CAD, I will hunt through my computer to find it
Budding F1 Engineer

Turbo
0
User avatar
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:28 am
Location: NJ

Re: 2014 Design

Postby Turbo » Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:09 pm

N12ck wrote:I did do a mockup a while ago of the 2014 regs in CAD, I will hunt through my computer to find it

I would like to see that. I wish they would go back to a shorter wheelbase.

FW17
147
User avatar
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:56 am

Re: 2014 Design

Postby FW17 » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:27 am

I think the location of the turbo exhaust is defined in the rules.

But wonder if the wastegate exhaust can be routed to any surface and be used to stall the aero element

godlameroso
38
User avatar
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2014 Design

Postby godlameroso » Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:55 am

Exhaust effects will be further diminished by the fact that anything that flows past the turbine will have a good chunk of it's energy absorbed by the turbine. I'm not saying effects will be eliminated but they will certainly be reduced. I think that removing the beam wing and lower nose will make the cars slower by about two seconds than this years.
The height of cultivation is really nothing special. It is merely simplicity; the ability to express the utmost with the minimum. Mr.Lee

raymondu999
138
User avatar
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:31 am

Re: 2014 Design

Postby raymondu999 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 5:17 am

Throttle control I'd imagine will be a lot more crucial in 2014. With peakier (I think?) power thanks to the turbo, and with less downforce.

I'm all for better car/throttle control, but I'm not crazy of laptimes going slower
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

StrikeForceF1
1
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:24 pm

Re: 2014 Design

Postby StrikeForceF1 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:31 am

raymondu999 wrote:Throttle control I'd imagine will be a lot more crucial in 2014. With peakier (I think?) power thanks to the turbo, and with less downforce.

I'm all for better car/throttle control, but I'm not crazy of laptimes going slower

Agree'd Ray....For far too long the FIA have gone year after year to reduce lap times.....sometimes with non-sensicle regulations. I'd like to see innovation back in F1 and performance differentiators, ie engines which may be developed throughout the season. That gives teams/engine manufactures the ability to level out the field with developements to their weak areas and others improving all in all making things spicier.

FW17
147
User avatar
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:56 am

Re: 2014 Design

Postby FW17 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:43 am

The resent WMSC ruling was for the same chassis/aero configuration as this year with a lower nose. Everything else is to remain same.

Huntresa
51
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:33 am

Re: 2014 Design

Postby Huntresa » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:19 pm

WilliamsF1 wrote:The resent WMSC ruling was for the same chassis/aero configuration as this year with a lower nose. Everything else is to remain same.


And still every designer they have interviewed so far is saying next years caars will be totally different, and not just cause the new engines.




Return to “Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests