Hamilton takes charge in second practice

By on
F1 Grand Prix, GP Great Britain, Silverstone Circuitgb

Following a suboptimal first practice session in the morning, Lewis Hamilton took charge during the second session of the day at Silverstone. At his home race he topped Nico Rosberg and Fernando Alonso.

While the Mercedes drivers changed order compared to the morning session, third and fourth fastest are still the same with Fernando Alonso again the closest competitor. Behind him, Red Bull put up a challenge while Valtteri Bottas put some smiles on the faces at Williams following a dismal first practice session for the team.

In the middle of the pack, McLaren and Toro Rosso appear to be doing fairly well while both Lotus drivers continued to fight their cars with visible ill handling. Force India's drivers were closely matched as well, but so far the team do not appear to be in as good shape as they were on previous weekends.

Results

Pos.NoDriverTeamTimeGapLaps
144Lewis HamiltonMercedes AMG1:34.508-14
26Nico RosbergMercedes AMG1:34.7360.22835
314Fernando AlonsoFerrari1:35.2440.73632
43Daniel RicciardoRed Bull Racing-Renault1:35.5111.00311
51Sebastian VettelRed Bull Racing-Renault1:35.6271.11927
677Valtteri BottasWilliams-Mercedes1:36.0161.50833
722Jenson ButtonMcLaren-Mercedes1:36.2281.72034
820Kevin MagnussenMcLaren-Mercedes1:36.2991.79135
97Kimi RäikkönenFerrari1:36.5542.04629
1025Jean-Eric VergneSTR-Renault1:36.5832.07526
1119Felipe MassaWilliams-Mercedes1:36.6712.16329
1226Daniil KvyatSTR-Renault1:36.7782.27031
1321Esteban GutierrezSauber-Ferrari1:36.9512.44335
1413Pastor MaldonadoLotus-Renault1:37.0642.55635
158Romain GrosjeanLotus-Renault1:37.0972.58933
1611Sergio PerezForce India-Mercedes1:37.2362.72837
1727Nico HulkenbergForce India-Mercedes1:37.4492.94127
1899Adrian SutilSauber-Ferrari1:37.5203.01225
1917Jules BianchiMarussia-Ferrari1:38.6584.15011
2010Kamui KobayashiCaterham-Renault1:39.0684.56031
214Max ChiltonMarussia-Ferrari1:39.2244.71628
229Marcus EricssonCaterham-Renault1:39.7625.25421


Share: