Manchild do you need a tissue?
Dredging up the past with such vitriole.
Much of what happened in 1994 has been put into context by time and history.
Schumacher's passing on the parade lap was very much a bit of gamesmanship on his part. He simply did it to unsettle Hill off the start line. He got wrapped over the knuckles, not even a warning a straight ban.
The black flag was due to his team telling him to stay out while they sort out the matter with the FIA. If you recall, he was called in for a penalty for passing Hill on the parade lap. In that (the 2nd time it happended on the lap) it was because Hill slowed suddenly and Schumacher took avoiding action and drover around him.
Williams lodged a formal complaint and got Schumacher a penalty. BEnetton appealed but kept Schumacher out. Benettons argued that the penalty was dished out after the statute of limitations had expired (there is a 25min window). But its England with an English driver in with a chance of winning so the race stewards didn't really give hot and handed out a black flag because Benetton has protested.
TC was never found on the car. LC was and it was Option 13. It was never proven to be used since the sensor suit (those little electronic gubbins that measure wheel slip) required to enable it was never found on the car on race weekends.
Then we have the stupid skidplank story. Schumacher was excluded from the Belgian Gp because the skid plank was worn too far. Benetton appealed because the wear scars on the plank indicated the wear was due to the car spinning over the kerbs earlier in the race. The race stewards were under FIA pressure to ensure Schumacher but mostly Benetton had a rough ride so they were excluded on the letter of the laaw and not common sense.
The Fuel rig filter is a matter of interpretation. The FIA stipulated that no tampering of the fuel to allow a increased flow rate is allowed.
Benetton saw a loophole and decided that removing a fuel filter is not considered tampering because its part that does not alter the functioning of the rig. They impreted tampering as increasing the speed of the electric motor or raising the pressure throgh mechanical modification. removing the filter was considered a maintenance issue and it was an acceptable risk.
The fire that resulted on Verstappens car was never directly attributed to dirt due to the filter being not present. The accident report merely stated that it was irregular and a possible contrbuting factor. The likely causal effect was simply that the nozzle was not fitted properly to the cars tank filler inlet during the stop. It has to go on square and straight. If it goes on skew the filler valve does not close properly. Thats hwo those rigs work. It was simply an accident but it happened to Benetton so that was an excuse for the FIA to wrap them over the knuckles again.
You can chose to view 1994 in many ways but those who do view it as a villianous scenario I feel incredibly sorry for because it really highlights a complete lack of understanding of the politics of F1