HALO Approved for 2018

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Post Reply
User avatar
RS200E
-4
Joined: 27 Feb 2017, 13:13

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

The power of Red Bull Powertrains!

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

RS200E wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 00:20
Has anyone signed the petition?

https://www.change.org/p/federation-int ... er_receipt
I have.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
RS200E
-4
Joined: 27 Feb 2017, 13:13

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

Me too. We allowed to make a thread about the petition?
The power of Red Bull Powertrains!

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

RS200E wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 01:16
Me too. We allowed to make a thread about the petition?
Why not discuss it here?
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
RS200E
-4
Joined: 27 Feb 2017, 13:13

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

djos wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 01:44
RS200E wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 01:16
Me too. We allowed to make a thread about the petition?
Why not discuss it here?
It'll get lost. Made a thread.
The power of Red Bull Powertrains!

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

imo Halo would have actually been more dangerous than nothing in Massa's heave spring incident as it risks deflecting the missile down into the the drivers chest potentially causing much more serious injuries or even a fatality.

The halo would not have saved Bianchi either.

and the halo would not have saved Surtees either as the wheel literally landed on top of his head (coming from the side) causing extensive brain injuries.

The shield style design is the only acceptable option from an aesthetic pov and realistic safety pov. It would have prevented Massa's injuries and would have saved Senna's life too as he died from being struck in the head by a piece of his own suspension iirc.

You can't make F1 100% safe as unfortunately freak incidents do happen, but at least the shield would increase safety and look good.
Last edited by djos on 22 Jul 2017, 06:07, edited 1 time in total.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
awizul
0
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 03:28
Location: +8GMT

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

RS200E wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 00:20
Has anyone signed the petition?

https://www.change.org/p/federation-int ... er_receipt
Done [-o<

User avatar
FW17
165
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

I previously had mentioned a polycarbonate piece between cockpit and halo. I think they can have an alternative.

Carbon strings spanning vertically 1/2 inch apart, the thickness of the string I going to be quiet minimal.

notsofast
2
Joined: 10 Oct 2012, 02:56

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

Well, this being a technical forum, would it be possible to make the halo strong enough so that the front vertical beam isn't needed? In other words, a halo that is supported from behind the driver's head only?

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

notsofast wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 14:06
Well, this being a technical forum, would it be possible to make the halo strong enough so that the front vertical beam isn't needed? In other words, a halo that is supported from behind the driver's head only?
It could be very strong, just never as strong as with a pillar. The problem with just an ring, you have no deflection when something gets stuck in there, like a FW or a piece of barrier. You would turn it in a guillotine basicly. The front pillar is essential.

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

It seems that the teams will be able to "trick up" the halo. They're allowed to add fairings to the hoop and these can be up to 30mm either side of the hoop itself. They're not allowed to do anything to the strut. This is obviously sensible in order to maintain visibility.

Will we see the hoop as downforce device or just a flow conditioner? It could potentially be quite powerful in the latter role.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22
Contact:

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

Pfff, i still like my design better from a purely aestetical point of view.... :(
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

Jolle wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 14:29
notsofast wrote:
22 Jul 2017, 14:06
Well, this being a technical forum, would it be possible to make the halo strong enough so that the front vertical beam isn't needed? In other words, a halo that is supported from behind the driver's head only?
It could be very strong, just never as strong as with a pillar. The problem with just an ring, you have no deflection when something gets stuck in there, like a FW or a piece of barrier. You would turn it in a guillotine basicly. The front pillar is essential.
jeesh talk about exxegeration. Image how many drivers have been decapaticed through a complete frigging front wing slamming into them? it's not essential, we've been driving FOREVER without. #-o #-o :roll: :roll:

also, drivers wear a HELMET. even IF there was no vertical beam, AND for some INSANE reason [that NEVER happened] a wing [INTACT!] flies off into it's direction, AND hit the face of the driver, it's still PROTECTED by a HELMET, AND, the chin, thus the head, is BELOW the top of the tub. :roll:

fabricating the most theoretically dangerous stuff is not science.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

morefirejules08
4
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 14:21

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

I can't help but think the halo would look much better if the centre support started where the nose kinks down and followed that line and the top hoop finished further up, just below the engine air intake.
Although the width of the halo would still look cumbersome I think from the side it would flow with the lines of the car more.

User avatar
Redragon
19
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: HALO Approved for 2018

Post

I guess the regulations would be clear, otherwise can be another area to develop aero as the T wing this year.
becoming even uglier

Post Reply